Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2014, 12:50:39 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2008 Elections
| | |-+  SC Gov Mark Sanford
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] Print
Author Topic: SC Gov Mark Sanford  (Read 27396 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27833


Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #225 on: March 05, 2005, 04:36:52 pm »
Ignore

I would actually argue that gerrymanders just distort the figures.

I would disagree.  For example, Maryland gerrymanders are balanced out by Pennsylvania gerrymanders.

In the end, it comes out to being fairly close, though not entirely accurate.

But as House and Senate elections have started to revolve more around national issues rather than local ones, the numbers have shown much more direct causality than say in the 1980s for example.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20702
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -1.74

View Profile
« Reply #226 on: March 05, 2005, 11:47:15 pm »
Ignore

Its not like I want the South out of our party, or anything.  I would much rather have them in, believe me.  I'm glad that we have such a solid base.

All I'm saying is that it wouldn't hurt any to expand the base and win over more states.

Right now, Missouri is not in the "base".  Ohio is not in the base.  Iowa is not in the base.  Florida is not in the base.  Nevada and New Mexico are not in the base.  Without them, we can't win.

Of course, Super, by your definition of "base", Oregon, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire are the not in the base either for Democrats.

We just live in very divided times politically in the Presidential realm.  I honestly don't see that changing in the near future, either.

But when that time does come, which side do we want to be onto.  Every moment we dely is another 10 electoral votes that we are losing once the breech closes and "divided times" are over.
Logged

Comrade Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 55490
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #227 on: March 06, 2005, 04:29:55 am »
Ignore

I would actually argue that gerrymanders just distort the figures.

I would disagree.  For example, Maryland gerrymanders are balanced out by Pennsylvania gerrymanders.

In the end, it comes out to being fairly close, though not entirely accurate.

But as House and Senate elections have started to revolve more around national issues rather than local ones, the numbers have shown much more direct causality than say in the 1980s for example.

Gerrymandering probably doesn't distort the overall summary figures a great deal, but it massivily distorts where those numbers are coming from making any comparision between Presidential and Congressional numbers somewhat meaningless.
Logged



Richard Hoggart 1918-2014
Notre Dame rules!
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 782


View Profile
« Reply #228 on: March 08, 2005, 10:11:55 pm »
Ignore

Gerrymandering has nearly killed the Democrat Party in the South.  By concentrating black voters into super majority districts, they have increased the number of black Congressional seats, while at the same time, virtually guaranteed that any white majority district will vote Republican.  There are exceptions, of course, but the trend has been that fewer and fewer white Democrats can get elected anywhere in the South. 

Black Democrats would much rather vote for blsack Democrat to represent them rather than a white Democrat, which is understandable--I suppose.

The  majority white district's Democrat base is considerably weakended in the process. 

So, while gerrymandering has greatly increased the number of black representatives in Congress, it has also served to bolster the GOP majority in Congress as a whole.
Logged

Econ Left/Right  3.00,  Social Libertarian/Authoritarian  2.97
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #229 on: March 08, 2005, 11:19:47 pm »
Ignore

It's political gerrymandering, not racial gerrymandering. The fact that blacks happen to virtually all be Democrats makes the two look similar, when in reality, they're not.
Logged
Notre Dame rules!
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 782


View Profile
« Reply #230 on: March 08, 2005, 11:33:15 pm »
Ignore

The Dems were all in favor of race-based districts, the thinking being that a grateful black population would continue to vote Democrat, which it did.  However, they didn't vote for just any Democrat, only black ones.

The GOP, who initially opposed the idea, found that it worked in their favor as well.  It concentrated Democrat voters in majority black districts.

You can say it wasn't racial gerrymandering, but since much of it was designed to increase black representationin Congress, how can you claim it was anything but.
Logged

Econ Left/Right  3.00,  Social Libertarian/Authoritarian  2.97
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #231 on: March 08, 2005, 11:41:37 pm »
Ignore

I thought you were saying the Republicans did it, which would be for political purposes. Not racially motivated ones.
Logged
Notre Dame rules!
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 782


View Profile
« Reply #232 on: March 08, 2005, 11:45:23 pm »
Ignore

okay, I see where you're coming from.
Logged

Econ Left/Right  3.00,  Social Libertarian/Authoritarian  2.97
Rob
Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6321
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

View Profile
« Reply #233 on: March 09, 2005, 01:24:18 am »
Ignore

I thought you were saying the Republicans did it, which would be for political purposes. Not racially motivated ones.

In this case, the political and racial reasons are the same.
Logged

Here’s what Sarah Palin represents: being a fat fucking pig who pins “Country First” buttons on his man titties and chants “U-S-A! U-S-A!” at the top of his lungs while his kids live off credit cards and Saudis buy up all the mortgages in Kansas.
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #234 on: March 09, 2005, 01:25:38 am »
Ignore

That's like saying firing a black guy for doing a lousy job is racist, because black people do lousy jobs.
Logged
nick
nickshepDEM
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6927


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

View Profile
« Reply #235 on: March 09, 2005, 01:25:43 am »
Ignore

Hey Bob, Im gonna' PM my 2008 blog Im working on.  So far I only have the Democratic rankings done.  Take a peak, tell me what you think, and if you have any suggestions on the layout or color or anything let me know.
Logged
Rob
Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6321
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

View Profile
« Reply #236 on: March 09, 2005, 01:27:53 am »
Ignore

Hey Bob, Im gonna' PM my 2008 blog Im working on.  So far I only have the Democratic rankings done.  Take a peak, tell me what you think, and if you have any suggestions on the layout or color or anything let me know.

Okay, sounds cool.
Logged

Here’s what Sarah Palin represents: being a fat fucking pig who pins “Country First” buttons on his man titties and chants “U-S-A! U-S-A!” at the top of his lungs while his kids live off credit cards and Saudis buy up all the mortgages in Kansas.
Rob
Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6321
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

View Profile
« Reply #237 on: March 09, 2005, 01:29:22 am »
Ignore

That's like saying firing a black guy for doing a lousy job is racist, because black people do lousy jobs.

No offense, but what the hell are you talking about?
Logged

Here’s what Sarah Palin represents: being a fat fucking pig who pins “Country First” buttons on his man titties and chants “U-S-A! U-S-A!” at the top of his lungs while his kids live off credit cards and Saudis buy up all the mortgages in Kansas.
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30582


View Profile
« Reply #238 on: March 09, 2005, 01:31:06 am »
Ignore

Gerrymandering has nearly killed the Democrat Party in the South.  By concentrating black voters into super majority districts, they have increased the number of black Congressional seats, while at the same time, virtually guaranteed that any white majority district will vote Republican.  There are exceptions, of course, but the trend has been that fewer and fewer white Democrats can get elected anywhere in the South. 

Black Democrats would much rather vote for blsack Democrat to represent them rather than a white Democrat, which is understandable--I suppose.

The  majority white district's Democrat base is considerably weakended in the process. 

So, while gerrymandering has greatly increased the number of black representatives in Congress, it has also served to bolster the GOP majority in Congress as a whole.

Yes, that law requiring minority majority districts has been very effectively used against the Democrats by southern Republicans. We end up with a few 60% black, 85% Democratic districts, and then all of the rest of the districts are Republican. It's a very effective political tool that I oppose.
Logged
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #239 on: March 09, 2005, 01:32:05 am »
Ignore

That's like saying firing a black guy for doing a lousy job is racist, because black people do lousy jobs.

No offense, but what the hell are you talking about?

Racial and business motivations are the same in this sitution, according to your logic.
Logged
Rob
Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6321
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

View Profile
« Reply #240 on: March 09, 2005, 01:36:05 am »
Ignore

That's like saying firing a black guy for doing a lousy job is racist, because black people do lousy jobs.

No offense, but what the hell are you talking about?

Racial and business motivations are the same in this sitution, according to your logic.

No. I said that the political implications were the same as the political ones, which is true.

I still don't see your point, honestly.
Logged

Here’s what Sarah Palin represents: being a fat fucking pig who pins “Country First” buttons on his man titties and chants “U-S-A! U-S-A!” at the top of his lungs while his kids live off credit cards and Saudis buy up all the mortgages in Kansas.
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #241 on: March 09, 2005, 01:37:35 am »
Ignore

The political implications were the same as the political ones...

Erm, okay...I guess I can't argue with that... Smiley
Logged
Rob
Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6321
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

View Profile
« Reply #242 on: March 09, 2005, 01:39:17 am »
Ignore

The political implications were the same as the political ones...

Erm, okay...I guess I can't argue with that... Smiley

You're damn right you can't. Wink
Logged

Here’s what Sarah Palin represents: being a fat fucking pig who pins “Country First” buttons on his man titties and chants “U-S-A! U-S-A!” at the top of his lungs while his kids live off credit cards and Saudis buy up all the mortgages in Kansas.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26714
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #243 on: March 09, 2005, 10:51:52 pm »
Ignore

I favor school choice, but Sanford's F-ed up scheme is terrible.  All it will do is give a tax-break to those who already home school or send their kids to private schools.  It's too small to provide help for those who send their kids to public school because they can't afford the cost of other options, but large enough to cost the state government a lot of revenue from those who would have chosen those other options anyway.  Sanford has put too much of his political capital on this lame brain idea for him to remain a serious 2008 Preseidential possibility if it doesn't pass, but if it does pass it's not going to improve our schools one bit.  However, it's passage will improve Sanford's 2008 primary chances, as such schemes are a favorite of many GOP core voters.
Logged

Daily Reflections on the Revised Common Lectionary

Bible thumping kept to a minimum unless you go to sleep!
The below comic stars me!
ArthurBranch
mpirner
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 84


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 6.78

View Profile
« Reply #244 on: March 10, 2005, 08:25:04 am »
Ignore

Its going to be Jeb, most likely, so no.
Logged
hawkeye59
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3036
United States


View Profile
« Reply #245 on: August 11, 2010, 06:36:41 am »
Ignore

LOL
I know it's been 5 years... but yeah.
Logged

My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair.  So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world.-Jack Layton 1950-2011
A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on-John F. Kennedy 1917-1963
feeblepizza
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3101
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

View Profile
« Reply #246 on: August 11, 2010, 04:04:06 pm »
Ignore

LOL
I know it's been 5 years... but yeah.

It's funny how laughable a lot of these pre-2008 threads are nowadays Smiley

I guess our 2012 predictions will be laughed at after five years though, too, won't they?
Logged

phk
phknrocket1k
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12976


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

View Profile
« Reply #247 on: August 12, 2010, 02:35:10 pm »
Ignore

Lock.
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines