Why was Connecticut so (relatively) Democratic during the Gilded Age?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:10:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Connecticut so (relatively) Democratic during the Gilded Age?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Connecticut so (relatively) Democratic during the Gilded Age?  (Read 1069 times)
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,541
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 14, 2013, 12:51:33 PM »

Why was Connecticut so Democratic (for New England) during the the late 1800s?

The rest of New England voted Republican in every election from 1856 through 1908, but the Democratic candidate carried the nutmeg state in four of those elections (Tilden once, Cleveland three times).  Also, the margins of victory were usually less than five points, while in neighboring Massachusetts and Rhode Island, they was usually more than 10.

Did Connecticut have more influence from NYC?  Were the Irish influential earlier than in the rest of New England?  What was the reason?
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2013, 07:38:28 PM »

The Irish to some extent, but moreover, Connecticut's never had the same "Yankee conservatism" culture that the rest of New England had up through the end of the 1980's (when it died in VT/NH/ME).
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2013, 10:47:06 AM »

The Irish to some extent, but moreover, Connecticut's never had the same "Yankee conservatism" culture that the rest of New England had up through the end of the 1980's (when it died in VT/NH/ME).

More along the lines of this.

Granted, there was some deep religious conservatism in the founding of the Connecticut Colony, but at the same time it also had some of the same Dutch influence that New York City and northern New Jersey had that tempered the devoutness of WASP Protestantism.  I should note that the colony of New Amsterdam had strong emphasis on ideas like religious freedoms and civil liberties, inevitably leading to a more religiously tolerant native population than New England.  Ideas like protectionism, military drafts, or martial law rubbed people in this cultural area as wrong and made them natural allies with the immigrant Irish and Germans who were immigrating to the area around the mid 19th century.  Martin Van Buren, who spoke Dutch as a first language, was instrumental in pretty much forming the northern wing of the Democratic Party that was notably pro-civil liberty, pro-free trade, divided on slavery ("barn burners" and the like), for expanding American influence on the continent but against foreign entanglements (pretty much a continuation of the Monroe Doctrine), and generally in support of increased immigration and universal suffrage for all white males regardless of religion, class, or creed.

So basically, voters who would've trended Democratic due to the anti-authoritarian tenets of the party, making them odd bedfellows with the South.

That is my paragraph long answer, I can make a more detailed multipage essay long one for those who are into tl;dr posts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.