bedstuy
YaBB God
Posts: 4,526
Political Matrix E: -1.16, S: -4.35
|
|
« on: September 16, 2013, 07:03:19 PM » |
|
Pro-choice.
In principle, I would be fine with restricting abortions after a certain point, perhaps 16 weeks. There is something very wrong to me about a late term abortion where the only reason is the convenience of the mother. However, I think there are valid reasons why a woman would want a late-term abortion. It could be the health of the mother, serious defects with the fetus or some other extenuating circumstance.
The problem is then, how do you make a rule that makes room for extenuating circumstances like the health of the mother? I can't think of a good way to regulate whether there is a legitimate health concern with the mother or the fetus. It's such a private, individual situation, both in terms of the individual moral concerns and the unique health situation. In light of that, I think it's probably best to have those tough medical ethics questions resolved by women in consultation with their doctors. If a woman is seeking an abortion that is not medically indicated and is very late in her pregnancy, a doctor should refuse to perform an abortion and submit the situation on an anonymous basis to a medical ethics review board. Then, perhaps an ethical doctor could and would refuse the request to perform a late term abortion and that would be a better limit than a government blanket rule.
|