Which State is Most Likely to "Flip" in 2016?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:59:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Which State is Most Likely to "Flip" in 2016?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Which of the close/relatively close states/districts in 2012 is most likely to flip to the other party in 2016?
#1
Florida
#2
North Carolina
#3
Ohio
#4
Virginia
#5
Colorado
#6
Pennsylvania
#7
New Hampshire
#8
Iowa
#9
Nevada
#10
Wisconsin
#11
Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District
#12
Minnesota
#13
Georgia
#14
Maine's 2nd Congressional District
#15
Arizona
#16
Missouri
#17
Michigan
#18
OTHER (Please specify)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Which State is Most Likely to "Flip" in 2016?  (Read 9891 times)
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: November 08, 2013, 02:59:27 PM »

DEM --> GOP: Florida, Ohio; Michigan

GOP --> DEM: 0,0

I don't know about Michigan unless Romney ran again for some reason.

Michigan will only flip in a victory similar to Obama '08, so you'd have to list CO, VA, NH, PA, NV, and WI before you could start talking about Michigan.

Along with OR, MN, IA, and NM. MI is between light blue and purplish blue.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: November 08, 2013, 07:17:59 PM »

Either CO or NC depending on who is winning.  I think Hillary would be stronger even in FL than CO.
Logged
CubanoTX
Newbie
*
Posts: 12
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: November 27, 2013, 01:27:34 PM »

Colorado and Ohio if the dems do not put a black face running again they will lose a lot of the black turnout and that will hurt a lot in those states Ohio even more so
Logged
BaldEagle1991
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,660
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: December 05, 2013, 09:39:34 PM »

I vote Florida.

But I will put in a big unlikely bet that New Jersey could possibly flip.



North Carolina closely followed by Arizona

In 2028 sometime in the 2020's Georgia & Texas will follow.

I'm just going to say that TX & GA are electoral identical twins, and them voting differently right now or any time in the future would break the space time continuum.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: December 06, 2013, 04:21:17 PM »

Either Florida to the GOP or North Carolina to the Democrats.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: December 06, 2013, 06:02:53 PM »

Colorado and Ohio if the dems do not put a black face running again they will lose a lot of the black turnout and that will hurt a lot in those states Ohio even more so

Dude there aren't many blacks in Colorado, and Ohio not many - though I agree that in the latter they could be decisive.  Don't forget that Ohio might see some working class whites swing D with a whiteface at the top of that ticket.
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: December 07, 2013, 01:17:00 AM »

I have to go with Florida.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: December 09, 2013, 11:18:09 PM »

Florida, pretty clearly.

It was Obama's closest state, and it has two potential Republican presidential contenders.

North Carolina's the most likely Romney state to flip, but it is historically unlikely since it requires the Democratic nominee to outperform Obama in 2012.
Logged
illegaloperation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 777


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: December 10, 2013, 04:41:02 AM »

North Carolina's the most likely Romney state to flip, but it is historically unlikely since it requires the Democratic nominee to outperform Obama in 2012.

North Carolina is experiencing the same similar demographic trends to those of those of Virginia.  The urban areas (Research Triangle, Charlotte, etc.) is gaining population while the rural parts of the state is losing population.

Furthermore, after the Republicans have taken over the state government for the first time in 130 years, they have alienate the urban dweller by pushing through far-right wing agenda.
Logged
Brewer
BrewerPaul
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,622


Political Matrix
E: -6.90, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: December 17, 2013, 10:58:19 AM »

Colorado. Hillary will probably be the nominee, and polls show her relatively getting her ass whooped, so in a Clinton-Christie matchup I think this would be the first state to flip.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: December 19, 2013, 10:49:34 AM »

If it's Clinton, as I'm just assuming it will be, Colorado is going to go back to the dark side. 

North Carolina, however, will once again be major network blue. 
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: December 19, 2013, 01:07:43 PM »

If it's Clinton, as I'm just assuming it will be, Colorado is going to go back to the dark side. 

I really doubt it.  CO polled a bit R sometimes on the way into all the recent elections..
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: December 21, 2013, 05:56:55 PM »

North Carolina's the most likely Romney state to flip, but it is historically unlikely since it requires the Democratic nominee to outperform Obama in 2012.

North Carolina is experiencing the same similar demographic trends to those of those of Virginia.  The urban areas (Research Triangle, Charlotte, etc.) is gaining population while the rural parts of the state is losing population.

Furthermore, after the Republicans have taken over the state government for the first time in 130 years, they have alienate the urban dweller by pushing through far-right wing agenda.

One disadvantage for Democrats is the likelihood of reduced African-American voter turnout without the first black President on the ballot.

I'm curious regarding the possibility of a backlash against state Republicans helping national candidates. Similar predictions have been made for other races over the years, but I'm wondering if it's ever happened.

Is there any presidential election in which a backlash against the Governor was deemed enough to swing a state? If so, what election and what state?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: December 23, 2013, 02:38:54 PM »

The problem is that a lot of people who would vote for Obama, will forget to vote or abstain if Hillary is running. And a lot of people who would do the opposite in 2008 and 2012, will not be willing to do so in 2016. The D brand is dying in the hills and waterways of the peripheral south. Whatever Hillary can get in votes there probably won't be enough to offset votes she couldn't get else where.
Logged
New_Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,139
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: January 19, 2014, 12:16:02 AM »

I'd say Ohio, and Florida are the most likely.

North Carolina is also possible.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: January 19, 2014, 03:14:22 AM »

I would say North Carolina. As many have mentioned before, what the Republicans did there was enough to put it in the Democratic column.
If Clinton wins, we might even see Georgia, and with great luck West Virginia, Arkansas, Kentucky or Missouri going to her; also I highly doubt it.
For the GOP the only states I see in reach are Florida, and maybe Colorado. I wouldn't say Ohio, as Clinton might be appealing to the working-class whites.

Btw: That's my first post in this forum ^^
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: January 19, 2014, 03:18:41 PM »

North Carolina's the most likely Romney state to flip, but it is historically unlikely since it requires the Democratic nominee to outperform Obama in 2012.

North Carolina is experiencing the same similar demographic trends to those of those of Virginia.  The urban areas (Research Triangle, Charlotte, etc.) is gaining population while the rural parts of the state is losing population.

Furthermore, after the Republicans have taken over the state government for the first time in 130 years, they have alienate the urban dweller by pushing through far-right wing agenda.

One disadvantage for Democrats is the likelihood of reduced African-American voter turnout without the first black President on the ballot.

I'm curious regarding the possibility of a backlash against state Republicans helping national candidates. Similar predictions have been made for other races over the years, but I'm wondering if it's ever happened.

Is there any presidential election in which a backlash against the Governor was deemed enough to swing a state? If so, what election and what state?

You could make a credible case for Florida 2012.  You could also argue that the whole Blagojevich saga got Mark Kirk elected in IL, but of course that isn't presidential.
Logged

excelsus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 692
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: January 19, 2014, 08:15:34 PM »

Missouri, of course. There's no way it would vote against Clinton.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: January 21, 2014, 08:06:49 PM »

Missouri, of course. There's no way it would vote against Clinton.
Are you serious?

I'd see Arkansas going for Clinton before Missouri, and I don't see Arkansas having a chance at going Democratic in 2016 at all.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: January 21, 2014, 08:34:14 PM »

Missouri, of course. There's no way it would vote against Clinton.
Are you serious?

I'd see Arkansas going for Clinton before Missouri, and I don't see Arkansas having a chance at going Democratic in 2016 at all.
Missouri could go Clinton in the right circumstances.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: January 21, 2014, 09:56:02 PM »

Missouri, of course. There's no way it would vote against Clinton.
Are you serious?

I'd see Arkansas going for Clinton before Missouri, and I don't see Arkansas having a chance at going Democratic in 2016 at all.

The urban areas make Missouri far more Democratic than Arkansas.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: January 22, 2014, 01:10:37 AM »

Missouri, of course. There's no way it would vote against Clinton.
Are you serious?

I'd see Arkansas going for Clinton before Missouri, and I don't see Arkansas having a chance at going Democratic in 2016 at all.

The urban areas make Missouri far more Democratic than Arkansas.
My bad. I definitely don't see Democrats flipping Missouri with Clinton at the top of the ticket which is why I replied originally, but I injected my gut thought that the Clintons would win their "home state" before they flipped Missouri, which ignored the fact that Missouri is stronger D in presidential elections than Arkansas.

Anyway, I just don't see how Hillary could shift either in her column if she was running in 2016 no matter what winning margin of the vote they gave Romney in 2012. I think the usual suspects will flip: North Carolina and Florida.
Logged
Starpaul20
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 287
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.68, S: -5.22

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: January 24, 2014, 12:12:31 AM »

I voted for Florida, but I can see either North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia or Colorado flipping too.
Logged
Clermont County GOPer
Rookie
**
Posts: 54
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: May 17, 2014, 10:35:52 PM »

Ohio
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 13 queries.