Labor Management Relations Act of 1947

[WalterMitty]

Yes, obviously.

if anything we should restrict unions more, not less.

[MATTROSE94]

No (D)

[courts]

Yes, obviously.

if anything we should restrict unions more, not less.

walter confirms what i just said in this thread. walter is the face of the white democrat. anyone pointing to his idiosyncrasies should be reminded that normal people's reasoning tends to be idiosyncratic and/or identity based. typically not (or at least, not that...) related to some issue check list or whatever spergy nonsense libertarians and true conservatives ^tm on the inter webs in particular like to go on about.

[Miles]

Yay (D).

Wait, I thought you were one of the traditionalist pro-union types.

No, I've always generally favored right to work laws.

[SPC]

Relunctant Aye, although I would prefer repealing both Taft-Hartley and the Wagner Act.

[All Along The Watchtower]

Vile legislation.

[politicallefty]

Nay (D). I think opposition to this act is a fundamental aspect of being a Democrat. I wish Democrats would prioritize its repeal.

[Mechaman]

Yay (D).

How the hell does an admirer of Huey Long support acts like this?

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

Aye (L) union membership should be voluntary. This set the stage for the Right to Work laws.

[TNF]

Aye (L) union membership should be voluntary. This set the stage for the Right to Work laws.

Which is why it should be repealed. Why do you support freeloaders?

[LastVoter]

Aye (L) union membership should be voluntary. This set the stage for the Right to Work laws.

Which is why it should be repealed. Why do you support freeloaders?

Libertarians want to turn the entire society into a casino.