Redalgo
Sr. Member
Posts: 2,681
|
|
« on: November 05, 2013, 02:16:05 AM » |
|
|
« edited: November 05, 2013, 02:30:29 AM by Redalgo »
|
To generalize a bit, Perónism seems to combine authoritarian government with a corporatist economy, anthropocentrism, fierce nationalism, and realist stances on foreign policy. Though superficially labour-friendly and mistakable for a form of socialism with its emphasis on social justice, Perónism presents a Third Position, class-collaborationist approach while being populist in rhetoric, making appeals (i.e. shamelessly pandering) to the masses. Perónism is basically the Diet Coke of fascism - neither totalitarian nor racist but with that same terrific, jackboot-to-the-face taste! And yes that was really a stretch. Please humour me.
Like many other "social justice" themed movements in lesser-developed countries, Perónism is well-suited for pragmatic leaders who see at least some value in having a strong state, solidarity, and an economy focused on national development (read: for corrupt players who realize the benefits of manipulating party machinery, abusing positions of privilege, and cultivating networks of patrimonial relationships). Even if I were to be less cynical for a moment, at best I can only see the name of Perón being invoked by Argentine parties the way FDR and JFK are by Democrats or as Lincoln and Reagan are by Republicans: as a strategic exertion of influence over voters using potent, tried-and-true symbolic capital.
Or at least for now that is my impression on it all. It'd be lovely if someone from Argentina would post here.
|