Lots of people fine with forcing poor women to have kids against their will in this thread.
Yeah, I'm pretty disappointed by the pro-choicers here.
You are reading the results in a manner that is not just uncharitable, but completely unjustified. I'm pretty confident that many if not most of the people voting option 2 are not "fine" with it in the least, they just consider it a lesser evil than option 1. The whole point of posts like these is to present a deliberately bad/difficult set of choices and force people to weigh one set of principles and rights against another; to claim otherwise is a cop-out.
Yeah, this is my view tbh.
It is very biased, I agree. There's no option up there for being pro-"abortion" or the correct term pro-choice, legal till the 28th week, and it being government funded. There needs to be funding no matter what and it shouldn't even be in question and shouldn't be on the poll.
Also, options 1 and 3 are incredibly Republican biased. 10 weeks? Come on, 20 weeks is one thing but 10 or even 6 is another.
I voted for option 2 in apathy.