Halperin: I believed in death panels before I didn't
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:12:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Halperin: I believed in death panels before I didn't
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Halperin: I believed in death panels before I didn't  (Read 571 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 26, 2013, 03:15:35 PM »

Slight paraphrase.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,260
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2013, 03:24:33 PM »

Good thing I didn't order the book yet.  Now I don't plan to.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2013, 03:39:02 PM »

Halperin has always been useless hack.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2013, 04:04:32 PM »
« Edited: November 26, 2013, 06:27:03 PM by Torie »

Sadly, death panels are inevitable. Otherwise, in time, most of our GDP would be spent on healthcare - an absolute impossibility of course. It is one of those hard truths that cannot be escaped, that nobody wants to talk about. Where the rubber really meets the road is when all those folks living longer, live into dementia. I read somewhere that about 50% of males by their late 80's have dementia. I also recall from somewhere that the incidence of dementia in the next 20 years will grow by five fold absent medical progress in technology to slow the process down (that was the one thing Gingrich was right about - figuring out how to slow the process down just has to be job one). Caring for demented is hideously expensive of course. And then there are those miracle drugs for psoriasis that I have mentioned. 3,000,000 folks with it, it doesn't kill you, you can have it for 40 years, and those biological drug shots cost about $800 every two weeks. You do the math.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2013, 04:08:38 PM »

Sadly, death panels are inevitable. Otherwise, in time, most of our GDP would be spent on healthcare - and absolute impossibility of course. It is one of those hard truths that cannot be escaped, that nobody wants to talk about. Where the rubber really meets the road is when all those folks living longer, live into dementia. I read somewhere that about 50% of males by their late 80's have dementia. I also recall from somewhere that the incidence of dementia in the next 20 years will grow by five fold absent medical progress in technology to slow the process down (that was the one thing Gingrich was right about - figuring out how to slow the process down just has to be job one). Caring for demented is hideously expensive of course. And then there are those miracle drugs for psoriasis that I have mentioned. 3,000,000 folks with it, it doesn't kill you, you can have it for 40 years, and those biological drug shots cost about $800 every two weeks. You do the math.

So, grow the economy.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2013, 12:00:45 AM »
« Edited: November 27, 2013, 12:03:57 AM by Indeed »

Sadly, death panels are inevitable. Otherwise, in time, most of our GDP would be spent on healthcare - an absolute impossibility of course. It is one of those hard truths that cannot be escaped, that nobody wants to talk about. Where the rubber really meets the road is when all those folks living longer, live into dementia. I read somewhere that about 50% of males by their late 80's have dementia. I also recall from somewhere that the incidence of dementia in the next 20 years will grow by five fold absent medical progress in technology to slow the process down (that was the one thing Gingrich was right about - figuring out how to slow the process down just has to be job one). Caring for demented is hideously expensive of course. And then there are those miracle drugs for psoriasis that I have mentioned. 3,000,000 folks with it, it doesn't kill you, you can have it for 40 years, and those biological drug shots cost about $800 every two weeks. You do the math.

That's the entire thing about "death panels". If there's nothing you can actually do about something, there's nothing you can do and between the hospices I have seen and the hospitals I have seen, I would prefer the hospice if I did not have the legal, filial or financial support needed to dictate how it ends for me. Further, you actually have to have health care (medicine that works) before you can provide people access to it.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,207
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2013, 04:46:24 PM »

Heilemann has always been the better (and more like able) of the two.
Logged
Link
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,426
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2013, 12:49:41 PM »

Well if people actually listen to what the guy is saying he is just saying that money can't be spent endlessly on everyone.  Which is a law of the physical universe not Obamacare.  He mentions that currently people do run into spending caps on their insurance plans.  No one is going to kill you or withdraw care if you have the cash to keep paying them.  What Halperin was saying is that the government and private insurance pools will have to abdicate from the responsibility of unlimited spending.  So if you save a few million dollars when the government says it makes no more sense to spend money on heroic efforts you can pay for them out of pocket.  Which seems reasonable.  Why forgo vaccinating a thousand children in order to perform some heroic surgery on an 80 year old widower with advanced dementia and stage IV cancer?
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2013, 01:09:01 PM »

Well if people actually listen to what the guy is saying he is just saying that money can't be spent endlessly on everyone.  Which is a law of the physical universe not Obamacare.  He mentions that currently people do run into spending caps on their insurance plans.  No one is going to kill you or withdraw care if you have the cash to keep paying them.  What Halperin was saying is that the government and private insurance pools will have to abdicate from the responsibility of unlimited spending.  So if you save a few million dollars when the government says it makes no more sense to spend money on heroic efforts you can pay for them out of pocket.  Which seems reasonable.  Why forgo vaccinating a thousand children in order to perform some heroic surgery on an 80 year old widower with advanced dementia and stage IV cancer?

Because Republicans don't care about health, they care about profits for the industries involved.  Thus, they want to prioritize the most expensive care.  Most vaccines are just a few dollars of profit, while a long hospital stay can be tens of thousands of dollars.  And, just like how Lexus makes more per car than Hyundai, the providers are going to prefer to deal in expensive care to make a profit. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 11 queries.