SENATE BILL: The Duke Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2013 (Amendment at Vote)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:41:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The Duke Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2013 (Amendment at Vote)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The Duke Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2013 (Amendment at Vote)  (Read 7828 times)
Sopranos Republican
Matt from VT
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.03, S: -8.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 27, 2013, 06:07:43 PM »
« edited: January 09, 2014, 09:50:14 AM by VP Matt »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: NC Yankee for the President

Senator Yankee, President Duke please begin advocating for this.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2013, 06:15:02 PM »

I'll let Duke go first on this. 1) Because it is his idea adn 2) his computer is cooperating more with him and then mine is with me. Tongue
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2013, 06:15:35 PM »

Unless the Senate is willing to go for further reduction to corporate taxes, I propose eliminating section 1.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2013, 06:18:45 PM »

I actually think our rates have been lowered. My objective here is to modernize our corporate tax system, to make us more competitive worldwide, and to allow us to recoup tax revenues that current sit offshore, to encourage companies to invest in their domestic operations as opposed to overseas in more favorable jurisdictions.

Today, corporations do not repatriate their overseas income. Most chose to outright leave the income idle in tax havens because they fear paying our higher tax, which hurts our budge and hurts domestic operations in Atlasia. We want Atlasian companies to INVEST in Atlasia and not overseas. Long term, this bill will help grow our economy and encourage these corporations to bring operations back to our shores. We are a friend to business here - not an enemy.

Many of you may have reservations about the tax exemption on investments made here, but consider this: if we did not include this provision, companies will likely chose to not invest in our country, so we would not get those tax revenues anyway. If this is what is needed to bring in new jobs, increase domestic activity and upgrade or expand domestic operations, it is something we can and should do.

Debate away. I will do my best to participate despite my exam schedule.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2013, 06:20:40 PM »

Also, this isn't even the right draft. Here is my proposal:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Sopranos Republican
Matt from VT
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.03, S: -8.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2013, 06:37:01 PM »

Sorry, gentlemen, it has been rectified.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2013, 09:40:10 PM »

Hm, do we have a GM analysis?

I'm not a fan of cutting corporate taxation, but there are perfectly reasonable times to cut taxes. Especially with the BIG, I'm not incredibly worried that workers will be disadvantaged.

In other words, if we can afford it, then I'd consider it.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2013, 01:00:53 AM »
« Edited: November 30, 2013, 01:02:52 AM by President Duke »

I would like to see GM stats on this, but these brackets for the most part were proposed under Nix's administration. I added the provision for tax exemption for domestic investments. My line of thinking is if we don't go with it, companies will simply not invest domestically as they are not doing now.

This bill will finally allow us to reach offshore income, albeit at a lower rate, which should make up for lowering rates. Ideally, we will see more tax revenue in the future, but we cannot predict the long run because, yes, we are all dead, but humor me, I have been studying for weeks on end and have had 6 cups of coffee today.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2013, 01:06:02 AM »

I'll probably be proposing an amendment to this tomorrow.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2013, 01:13:31 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Here's an amendment I am offering. Noting the change in the tax rate is irrelevant, since we have passed the White House budget with the tax rates like that. The second is jobs. I don't think we should be exclusively rewarding returning manufacturing jobs to Atlasia, and instead rewarding companies who plan to invest here period, regardless of the type of work.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2013, 01:21:07 AM »

I'm fine with those changes, ftr
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2013, 07:30:58 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Friendly
Status: Senators have 24 hours to object.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2013, 10:17:43 AM »

Nevermind, I don't think I have anything to add after all.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2013, 06:07:46 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding this, but I think this is a HUGE problem. Essentially, any income earned anywhere is taxable by the Atlasian government, but there's no check on the time period. Does that mean that immigrants would owe back taxes for the time before they immigrated?
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2013, 06:39:13 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding this, but I think this is a HUGE problem. Essentially, any income earned anywhere is taxable by the Atlasian government, but there's no check on the time period. Does that mean that immigrants would owe back taxes for the time before they immigrated?

This is only for corporate income. Immigrants pay personal income taxes. This bill only concerns corporate taxation.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2013, 06:59:11 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding this, but I think this is a HUGE problem. Essentially, any income earned anywhere is taxable by the Atlasian government, but there's no check on the time period. Does that mean that immigrants would owe back taxes for the time before they immigrated?

This is only for corporate income. Immigrants pay personal income taxes. This bill only concerns corporate taxation.

Well, I'll introduce an amendment to clarify that.

The problem still kind of stands, though. This essentially means that ALL corporations worldwide would owe taxes to the Atlasian government. Let's say a corporation repatriates some services; in doing so, the corporation would owe back taxes for the services while they were expatriated. That's a major issue.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2013, 08:13:06 PM »

We need to just clarify that only corporations incorporated in Atlasia are subject to it. To clarify.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2013, 08:27:29 PM »

We need to just clarify that only corporations incorporated in Atlasia are subject to it. To clarify.

I'll introduce the amendment once Maxwell's is through.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2013, 08:36:46 PM »

58:34 has been adopted.


Yes that needs to be rewritten and carefully so at that. Remember, that the chance for counterproductive consequences from a poorly thoughrout or worded approach to profits earned overseas by companies and such could lead to more of what is sought to be reduced or eliminated.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2013, 09:26:42 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Is this amendment acceptable? I'm not entirely sure about the language.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2013, 09:41:35 PM »

I accept that amendment as my friend.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2013, 03:39:11 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Friendly
Status: Senators have 24 hours to object.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2013, 06:36:03 AM »

Are there any good synonyms for the words corporation, corporate, or incorporated? Section 1, Clause 2 now has 8 mentions of those "corp" words in some form, and it's annoying the crap out of me (even though it's my fault to begin with).
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 05, 2013, 12:45:27 AM »

Corporate entity?
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2013, 01:03:37 AM »


I guess, but it still has corporate in it.

Whatever, I'd rather have a good bill with silly language than a silly bill with good language.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 11 queries.