I reiterate States' point. Has anyone been held by this. Has the government used their powers to inspect library use? A big NO to that.
How the hell would you know? They don't have to tell anyone.
Again, what good would it do them to hold someone illegally?
That's what I'm wondering. Technically, since the Patriot Act says this, it's nto illegal. How many of these detainees have been charged with a crime? It's unconstitutional to hold these people without charging them with a crime. Even the Nazis were charged with war crimes.
Amendment V
No PERSON (not citizen) shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Have these terrorists been prosecuted by military tribunals yet, if so, show me the evidence. They don't have to keep that from us. I don't think telling us that these people have been prosecuted jeopradizes national security. Again, if you think it does tell me why. To my knowledge no one has been prosecuted yet. If they are going to be held at gitmo, I think they should at least be put in front of some sort of military tribunal.