SWEDEN - September 14, 2014 - GUIDE and THREAD (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 03:01:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  SWEDEN - September 14, 2014 - GUIDE and THREAD (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: SWEDEN - September 14, 2014 - GUIDE and THREAD  (Read 97566 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: December 27, 2013, 07:14:20 AM »

Awesome thread! Thanks SC! Smiley
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2013, 05:41:51 AM »

Wow, I had no idea farmers were so right-wing... Didn't they in good part back the SAP in the 1930s-70s?

Also, what share of the population do they represent today? Is it a marginal 1-2% like in France or are they actually an important demographic?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2013, 09:49:44 AM »

I'm not sure how farmers in France vote. They're probably solidly right-wing, but I'd imagine that the left could break 10% or even 15% among them.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2014, 10:48:28 AM »

Very promising numbers! Smiley What a shame that the election is so far away...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2014, 05:47:51 PM »

Yeah, I also think a S+MP minority coalition working across the aisle would be the most likely out-come if the left doesn't have its own majority, and in my view I actually wouldn't mind that so much. I could live with a wing-clipped compromising left government.

Ugh, this sounds like it has the potential to be a HORRIBLE government.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2014, 06:04:33 AM »

The Left (communist) leader has said that he will NOT support a guvernment that is party is not a part off.

LOL
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2014, 04:50:16 PM »

The government has apparently decided that they want to go out with a bang as big as 1994, and  turn as many people as possible against them before the election. But what do I know, giving your voter base and the swing voters the finger at the same time might be a stroke of brilliance I have yet to understand,   

Maybe they have realized they were going to lose anyway and want to leave as big a "policy mark" as they can.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2014, 12:59:31 PM »

Yeah, France has always had the dumbest unions in the world. For this as for everything else, Sweden rules.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2014, 04:19:51 PM »

The upcoming election inspired me to compile some data about Swedish elections from 1911 on. Here are a few charts I made, if someone's interested. Smiley


Party results as a % of valid votes:


Party results as a share of registered voters:


Coalition results as a % of registered voters:


Hoping to see the much needed red rebound in 2014! Tongue
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2014, 05:46:21 AM »
« Edited: March 24, 2014, 05:51:22 AM by Antonio V »

Thanks Lurker! Smiley

I don't get how you're calculating stuff in that graph. What are you counting as part of the coalitions?

Red = Left/Communists + SAP + Greens

Blue = Moderates + KDs + Liberals + Centre

I know these coalitions haven't always been stable through time, but I thought it would only make things more confusing to include different parties at different times. And yeah, I should have said bloc.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2014, 08:05:58 AM »

Thanks Lurker! Smiley

I don't get how you're calculating stuff in that graph. What are you counting as part of the coalitions?

Red = Left/Communists + SAP + Greens

Blue = Moderates + KDs + Liberals + Centre

I know these coalitions haven't always been stable through time, but I thought it would only make things more confusing to include different parties at different times. And yeah, I should have said bloc.

Oh, ok. So why not as share of voters then? This seems like an unnecessary deflation of the numbers to me. Tongue

Because the red and blue lines as % of valid votes largely mirror each other, since for most of Sweden's history no party outside of the blocs garnered a significant amount of support. I thought this version of the graph would add a lot of information without losing any.

Admittedly, electoral results that factor in abstention are a pet issue to me, and I know most people don't find them that interesting. Wink Anyway I also have the other version of the graph, I can upload it too if you're interested.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2014, 04:37:23 AM »
« Edited: March 28, 2014, 04:39:11 AM by Antonio V »

Here it is! Smiley



As you see, it almost always adds up to 97-99% except for 1991, 2006 and 2010.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2014, 04:53:45 AM »

Also, for good measure, here's the first chart corrected by abstention:



It's interesting in that it cancels out both the SAP drop in 1928 (showing a continuous growth from 1920 to 1940) and the big 1940 outlier. It also shows SAP still slightly over their 1928 levels, as opposed to having shrunk back to their 1910s numbers.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #13 on: March 29, 2014, 07:48:11 AM »

What's your populist far-right thing in the 30s? Is is the Commie-turned-Nazi grouping?

Also, to those who are unaware, that colour is for New Democracy in the early 90s and for the Sweden Democrats in the 00s even though those parties are in many ways very, very different beasts.

Yeah, I've included the "national socialists" in that grouping. The Left/Communist and Right/Populist groups are the only ones that aggregate several parties at different times, including some fairly minor ones.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #14 on: April 18, 2014, 03:50:54 AM »

Is there a chance FI gains enough traction to reach the 4% threshold? It would be wonderful to see that happen. Cheesy
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #15 on: April 23, 2014, 12:05:41 PM »

Sorry if I sound pedantic here, but what would "modern conservative" entail, as you see it? I.e., comparable to what foreign parties? Wouldn't they still overlap quite a lot with Moderaterna?

Same question.

You seem to assume that Moderaterna is a conservative party these days...

I mean taking actual conservative positions. Like, cutting taxes and opposing a large welfare state. Wanting a strong defence. Being a little bit patriotic, perhaps favouring some restrictions on immigration.

Moderaterna is doing none of that at the moment, which is why another party could take it.

But isn't M's centrist turn a consequence of the fact that such a "conservative" party would just never manage to become electorally competitive? Pre-2006 electoral history would point in that direction. Tongue
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #16 on: April 23, 2014, 02:13:14 PM »

Sorry if I sound pedantic here, but what would "modern conservative" entail, as you see it? I.e., comparable to what foreign parties? Wouldn't they still overlap quite a lot with Moderaterna?

Same question.

You seem to assume that Moderaterna is a conservative party these days...

I mean taking actual conservative positions. Like, cutting taxes and opposing a large welfare state. Wanting a strong defence. Being a little bit patriotic, perhaps favouring some restrictions on immigration.

Moderaterna is doing none of that at the moment, which is why another party could take it.

But isn't M's centrist turn a consequence of the fact that such a "conservative" party would just never manage to become electorally competitive? Pre-2006 electoral history would point in that direction. Tongue

You're taking the wrong attitude. Pre 2006-M usually raked in about 20% of the vote. I think KD would be pretty happy with half of that. Tongue

Well, they certainly could get up to 20% (that's what the FrP did in Norway, after all), but even if they did, there's no way they'd get enough support from other parties to lead a government or to push economic policy massively to the right. Thank God Sweden doesn't have a two-party system. Wink In order to really hold power for a significant amount of time, you need to get at least as centrist as M did.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #17 on: April 24, 2014, 02:13:13 AM »

Sorry if I sound pedantic here, but what would "modern conservative" entail, as you see it? I.e., comparable to what foreign parties? Wouldn't they still overlap quite a lot with Moderaterna?

Same question.

You seem to assume that Moderaterna is a conservative party these days...

I mean taking actual conservative positions. Like, cutting taxes and opposing a large welfare state. Wanting a strong defence. Being a little bit patriotic, perhaps favouring some restrictions on immigration.

Moderaterna is doing none of that at the moment, which is why another party could take it.

But isn't M's centrist turn a consequence of the fact that such a "conservative" party would just never manage to become electorally competitive? Pre-2006 electoral history would point in that direction. Tongue

You're taking the wrong attitude. Pre 2006-M usually raked in about 20% of the vote. I think KD would be pretty happy with half of that. Tongue

Well, they certainly could get up to 20% (that's what the FrP did in Norway, after all), but even if they did, there's no way they'd get enough support from other parties to lead a government or to push economic policy massively to the right. Thank God Sweden doesn't have a two-party system. Wink In order to really hold power for a significant amount of time, you need to get at least as centrist as M did.

I'm not sure I understand your point. It isn't as if KD is leading a government at the moment either?

My point is that by pushing to the right they could become a strong junior coalition partner in a centre-right alliance as opposed to a weak one like they are now. Disgruntled M voters could vote for them to drag the government rightwards.

Sure, that definitely could work. I'm not really disagreeing with you. My point simply is that this might not be a good thing for the right-wing coalition overall.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #18 on: April 24, 2014, 08:37:41 AM »

Sorry if I sound pedantic here, but what would "modern conservative" entail, as you see it? I.e., comparable to what foreign parties? Wouldn't they still overlap quite a lot with Moderaterna?

Same question.

You seem to assume that Moderaterna is a conservative party these days...

I mean taking actual conservative positions. Like, cutting taxes and opposing a large welfare state. Wanting a strong defence. Being a little bit patriotic, perhaps favouring some restrictions on immigration.

Moderaterna is doing none of that at the moment, which is why another party could take it.

But isn't M's centrist turn a consequence of the fact that such a "conservative" party would just never manage to become electorally competitive? Pre-2006 electoral history would point in that direction. Tongue

You're taking the wrong attitude. Pre 2006-M usually raked in about 20% of the vote. I think KD would be pretty happy with half of that. Tongue

Well, they certainly could get up to 20% (that's what the FrP did in Norway, after all), but even if they did, there's no way they'd get enough support from other parties to lead a government or to push economic policy massively to the right. Thank God Sweden doesn't have a two-party system. Wink In order to really hold power for a significant amount of time, you need to get at least as centrist as M did.

I'm not sure I understand your point. It isn't as if KD is leading a government at the moment either?

My point is that by pushing to the right they could become a strong junior coalition partner in a centre-right alliance as opposed to a weak one like they are now. Disgruntled M voters could vote for them to drag the government rightwards.

Sure, that definitely could work. I'm not really disagreeing with you. My point simply is that this might not be a good thing for the right-wing coalition overall.

Well, if the Red-Greens can win with V...

Sweden is a left-leaning country. News at 11. Tongue
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2014, 06:35:58 AM »

I have a question for SwedishCheese and for Gustaf.

I mean, in the USA, you're both definitely seen as moderate. But in Sweden, is that the case too? I mean, are you "potential swing voters" like in the US or you definitely choose the center right coalition?

SwedishCheese is a committed Centre Party voter, so yeah, you can count him safely on the right coalition. Gustaf hasn't made up his mind yet, but I recall the choices he's considering are mostly on the right side as well.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #20 on: May 19, 2014, 09:21:50 AM »

I don't really see how the modern Swedish left could be considered "extremist" in any way. From what I've seen in this thread, the SAP are mostly a left-leaning big tent government party at this point.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #21 on: May 19, 2014, 11:26:50 AM »

SAP has lurched to the centre in response to losing 2 elections. Which is part of why I am now considering to vote for them. Wink

Yeah, because Göran Persson was such a pinko commie. Roll Eyes
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2014, 10:39:49 AM »

OK, probably Rosenberg is just seen in Finland as a typical Swede concerning feminism (although she is actually Finn).  Same time it was told that Göran Person considered himself feminist, that was interpreted as support to radical feminist world view ( an appeaser of radical feminism). 

Gustaf, I have never seen you to distance yourself from feminist demagogy.

Wow, that's some incoherent nonsense. Are you high?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2014, 12:35:27 PM »


So your impression was based on some random documentary which (reading the wikipedia article) was eventually revealed to be a huge pile of bullsh*t? Well, that's what I call an informed judgement. Roll Eyes
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,191
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #24 on: July 01, 2014, 02:13:37 PM »

Sounds about right:

85% Feministiskt initiativ
79% Vänsterpartiet
71% Miljöpartiet
71% Socialdemokraterna
69% Piratpartiet
57% Folkpartiet
51% Kristdemokraterna
44% Centerpartiet
36% Moderaterna
33% Sverigedemokraterna
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 13 queries.