Canadian by-elections, 2014
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:21:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canadian by-elections, 2014
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31
Author Topic: Canadian by-elections, 2014  (Read 59770 times)
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #600 on: October 27, 2014, 10:49:04 PM »

Terrible news for Wildrose to lose Calgary-West.

Great news for the Alberta Party. They have proved they are still relevant. I'm not sure where their natural base is though?

Also, it looks like the NDP will finish 2nd in Whitemud. This is fabulous news. Hopefully this means the party can win a handful of seats in the city.
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #601 on: October 27, 2014, 10:51:07 PM »

Calgary-West 74/74 polls reporting:
Mike Ellis (PC): 44.44% (-5.51)
Sheila Taylor (WRP): 41.55% (+4.22)
David Khan (LIB): 8.50% (+1.04)
Brian Malkinson (NDP): 3.08% (+0.07)
Troy Millington (AP): 2.43% (+1.46)
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #602 on: October 27, 2014, 11:03:40 PM »

Calgary-Foothills 79/79 polls reporting:
Jim Prentice (PC): 58.26% (+4.72)
Kathy MacDonald (WRP): 29.94% (-3.61)
Robert Prcic (LIB): 3.87% (-5.29)
Jennifer Burgess (NDP): 3.75% (+0.00)
Polly Knowlton Cockett (GRN): 2.20% (+2.20)
Michelle Glavine (AP): 1.79% (+1.79)
Dave Woody Phillips (IND): 0.19% (+0.19)
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #603 on: October 27, 2014, 11:13:17 PM »

Edmonton-Whitemud 95/95 polls reporting:
Stephen Mandel (PC): 42.36% (-18.13)
Bob Turner (NDP): 22.23% (+13.09)
Tim Grover (WRP): 18.90% (+2.59)
Donna Wilson (LIB): 14.42% (+2.70)
William Munsey (AP): 1.43% (-0.92)
Rene Malenfant (GRN): 0.67% (+0.67)
Logged
DL
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,412
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #604 on: October 27, 2014, 11:25:44 PM »

The NDP's 2nd place showing with 22% in Edmonton-Whitemud is particularly good when you consider that White is absolutely the worst riding in the whole city for the NDP - its very wealthy and very suburban - they didn't even come close to winning there when they swept Edmonton in the 80s.
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #605 on: October 27, 2014, 11:30:58 PM »

Calgary-Elbow 83/83 polls reporting:
Gordon Dirks (PC): 33.21% (-24.88)
Greg Clark (AP): 26.94% (+24.25)
John Fletcher (WRP): 24.13% (-4.45)
Susan Wright (LIB): 11.99% (+6.46)
Stephanie McLean (NDP): 3.73% (-0.22)
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #606 on: October 28, 2014, 01:49:10 AM »

Every time I hear about the Alberta Party I wish they would go away. I don't know what inspires such distaste in me for a minor party
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #607 on: October 28, 2014, 03:13:02 AM »

I would seriously suggest that the NDP and Liberals in Alberta merge. It makes them competitive enough so that strategic voting wouldn't even be necessary to stop Wildrose, at least in most urban seats. Plus if the left has near zero presence seat-wise, the PCs will be more inclined to cater right to fend off Wildrose. If BC Liberals and the Sask. Party pulled off mergers so could they.
Logged
lilTommy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,820


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #608 on: October 28, 2014, 06:25:10 AM »

I would seriously suggest that the NDP and Liberals in Alberta merge. It makes them competitive enough so that strategic voting wouldn't even be necessary to stop Wildrose, at least in most urban seats. Plus if the left has near zero presence seat-wise, the PCs will be more inclined to cater right to fend off Wildrose. If BC Liberals and the Sask. Party pulled off mergers so could they.

The NDP won't think of these, let along its the only party in Canada where the federal and provincial wings are joined; there are big ideological differences between the NDP and Liberals. I could see the Liberals fold into the PCs as you have in BC (sorta) or even the Alberta Party and the Liberals merging  before the NDP merges with the Liberals.
Also at this point, the NDP is leading or close to leading in Edmonton, and they have a new leader. Not happening. The Liberals on the other hand are in a bit more of a mess
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #609 on: October 28, 2014, 06:34:46 AM »

I know a lot of non-ideological people on the left want the Liberals and NDP to merge, but there are more similarities between Liberals and Tories than there are between Liberals and the NDP. Better for the Liberals and Alberta Party to merge.

Interesting results. Not a bad night for the Tories. A terrible night for Wildrose. All four ridings are fairly wealthy, especially Elbow and Whitemud, and it appears the wealthy in Alberta do not like Wildrose. Jim Prentice is a natural fit for the Alberta upper class.
Logged
andrew_c
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 454
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #610 on: October 28, 2014, 08:59:40 AM »

I would seriously suggest that the NDP and Liberals in Alberta merge. It makes them competitive enough so that strategic voting wouldn't even be necessary to stop Wildrose, at least in most urban seats. Plus if the left has near zero presence seat-wise, the PCs will be more inclined to cater right to fend off Wildrose. If BC Liberals and the Sask. Party pulled off mergers so could they.

There's pretty much no way the Liberals and NDP would consider and electoral pact/coalition, never mind a merger.
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #611 on: October 28, 2014, 09:16:52 AM »

Interesting results. Not a bad night for the Tories. A terrible night for Wildrose. All four ridings are fairly wealthy, especially Elbow and Whitemud, and it appears the wealthy in Alberta do not like Wildrose. Jim Prentice is a natural fit for the Alberta upper class.

In Lethbridge College's yearly polls of the Alberta provincial political scene, the PCs are consistently do the best amongst Albertans with household incomes over $120,000.  Voters over the age of 65 (and to a lesser extent, those between 45 and 64) also seem to favour the PCs over the Wildrose.  WRP support is more pronounced in middle-aged, lower-middle to middle class Albertans.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #612 on: October 28, 2014, 10:35:38 AM »

The similarities between Toronto and Alberta are hard to ignore.

Wildrose = Ford Nation
PCs = John Tory
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #613 on: October 28, 2014, 03:27:22 PM »

Danielle Smith will submit herself to a leadership review at the WRP AGM in November; she wants to get above the 'magic number' of 77% to stay on as leader.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #614 on: October 28, 2014, 04:39:56 PM »

I know a lot of non-ideological people on the left want the Liberals and NDP to merge, but there are more similarities between Liberals and Tories than there are between Liberals and the NDP. Better for the Liberals and Alberta Party to merge.

Indeed.

Unite the left sentiments tend to have a strong "Stop Harper" tinge to them and ignore that the differences between Liberal and NDP cut quite deep; deeper than the the old Tory-Reform split.

Also, why does the Alberta Party even exist? I can't see who they're appealing too that the other parties don't have locked up.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #615 on: October 28, 2014, 04:55:03 PM »

In Ontario or federally I wouldn't support such a merger - but I thought that maybe in Alberta where the centre-left has had a history of being locked out it might work out to their advantage. I mean any merger - Alberta+Liberals, whatever. If the parties themselves don't want it then I guess the status quo stays there for yet another decade or two.
I really do want to see the old PC elite to get their day of reckoning, just not by Wildrose which would be worse.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #616 on: October 28, 2014, 07:56:09 PM »

Even if all the left wing and centrist parties merged in Alberta, it would be nowhere near close enough to even form official opposition.

A lot of progressives backed (and still back) the PCs, to stop Wildrose. I think one of our posters here, njall is one such example.
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #617 on: October 28, 2014, 08:37:19 PM »

Even if all the left wing and centrist parties merged in Alberta, it would be nowhere near close enough to even form official opposition.

A lot of progressives backed (and still back) the PCs, to stop Wildrose. I think one of our posters here, njall is one such example.

I'm sure Njall might correct us, but I believe s/he is a bona-fide Alberta PC. Not so much of a CPC person
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #618 on: October 28, 2014, 09:08:56 PM »

And keep in mind that the Alberta New Democrats are now led by Rachel Notley--daughter of party icon Grant Notley.  And a lot are banking on that fact.  (Shades of Justin Trudeau, but with more substance.)
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #619 on: October 29, 2014, 02:18:27 PM »

Also, why does the Alberta Party even exist? I can't see who they're appealing too that the other parties don't have locked up.

The Alberta Party seems to be orienting itself as a 'catch-all' party, particularly for voters in the political centre and centre-left.  It doesn't seem to have a comprehensive platform as of yet, and instead appears to be defining itself with broad goals that would be agreeable to almost anyone.  That said, I think of their base as largely being made up of former Liberal voters, and centrist/progressive voters who are disenchanted with the other parties.


Even if all the left wing and centrist parties merged in Alberta, it would be nowhere near close enough to even form official opposition.

A lot of progressives backed (and still back) the PCs, to stop Wildrose. I think one of our posters here, njall is one such example.

I'm sure Njall might correct us, but I believe s/he is a bona-fide Alberta PC. Not so much of a CPC person

(I'm a 'he,' for the record)

That's pretty much spot-on.  I will admit that back in 2012 when I got involved with the party, my main goal was to help defeat the WRP incumbent in my riding.  However, when I did get involved and when I met other people who were involved with the party, I realized that the (post-Klein) PCs are actually a pretty good fit for the pragmatic, moderate political direction that I generally subscribe to.  The broad label 'progressive' is probably fitting for me, and I do certainly consider myself to be on the left/progressive side of the party, but I still feel quite at home in the party, and I'm strongly supportive of Prentice's government thus far.

Federally, on the other hand, I'm very independent at the moment.  There are some CPC MPs whom I have a favourable view of at the moment, but I'm certainly not a Harper fan, and I wouldn't say that I support the CPC as a whole.
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #620 on: October 29, 2014, 05:59:42 PM »

Is what seperates the NDP and the Liberals worse than what seperates Tony Blair and Tony Benn? Bill Clinton and Dennis Kucinich? No. They could be one damn party.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #621 on: October 29, 2014, 06:53:52 PM »

Is what seperates the NDP and the Liberals worse than what seperates Tony Blair and Tony Benn? Bill Clinton and Dennis Kucinich? No. They could be one damn party.

Yes, in a sense. The Liberals are a corporatist party. No way the rank and file NDPers would tolerate becoming a corporatist party.  Dennis Kucinich doesn't seem to have that problem.

Would Bernie Sanders become a Democrat? No.
Logged
Citizen Hats
lol-i-wear-hats
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 680
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #622 on: October 29, 2014, 07:18:25 PM »

Bernie Sanders sits in the Democratic caucus, he votes with them on procedural votes, and he runs in and wins the Democratic primary. He is a cosmetic-independent
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #623 on: October 29, 2014, 07:39:57 PM »

Aside from the political and cultural differences, who's to say we have it wrong in Canada, whereas the US has it right? I would love it if the US had its own social democratic party.

But, I have to go back to my earlier point. The Liberals and Tories have a lot more in common than the Liberals and NDP. Look no further than the Toronto mayoral election. Liberals in Toronto had the choice between a conservative (John Tory) and a New Democrat (Olivia Chow) and overwhelmingly backed Tory.  A lot of that was to stop Ford, but remember, Chow had been leading at one point.

Similarly, we saw in the federal election, a lot of Liberals switching to the Conservatives to stop the NDP.

In a lot urban centres there are a lot of people who switch between the NDP and Liberals, but they pale in comparison between the Liberal-Conservative swing voters in the more populous suburbs.
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #624 on: October 29, 2014, 08:48:39 PM »

W/the Alta Liberals, depends on which way the wind is blowing.  In fact, back when they were most in contention for power (i.e. the early 90s under Decore), they were aggressively bidding for the PC "right vote".
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.