Should 20RP12 be banned?

[7,052,770]

Can someone make a straightforward recap post?  I must have missed something.

1. The Arizonan makes a thread complaining about his lack of a sex life
2. Folks recommend that he looks at porn
3. Carl refers him to a porn site and others accuse him of knowing that this site has a reputation for containing child pornography
4. S**tstorm

Ah. And it the thread now deleted?

[Grumpier Than Thou]

Can someone make a straightforward recap post?  I must have missed something.

1. The Arizonan makes a thread complaining about his lack of a sex life
2. Folks recommend that he looks at porn
3. Carl refers him to a porn site and others accuse him of knowing that this site has a reputation for containing child pornography
4. S**tstorm

Ah. And it the thread now deleted?

Yes. No death points, either.

[Peter the Lefty]

Definitely not. 

[Oakvale]

He supposedly wants to be banned anyway (yet is still posting at a mile a minute?) so I'm not sure why this thread is.

[Holmes]

ITT: People asking for links to a website once they heard it might host child pornography.

Ban bait.

[DC Al Fine]

He linked to a site known for hosting child pornography.

Wait that was Carl? I thought that kerfuffle was over Opebo

[HagridOfTheDeep]

Why do I have to read about this garbage every time I log in here? Can't people just get their sh*t together anymore?

[MATTROSE94]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

[PJ]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

Krazen has indirectly insulted a number of family members and friends. I would support his banning.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

Krazen has indirectly insulted a number of family members and friends. I would support his banning.

Indirectly. But its cool with you if child porn is linked "indirectly" or that Opebo can post his exploits "indirectly."

[Ban my account ffs!]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

Krazen has indirectly insulted a number of family members and friends. I would support his banning.

Indirectly. But its cool with you if child porn is linked "indirectly" or that Opebo can post his exploits "indirectly."

Show me where child porn was linked even indirectly.  Or where Opebo posted his exploits on Atlas in such a way that broke the Terms of Service.

If someone insults your friends or family members, they should be infracted.  That is one area where I would be ruthless as a mod.  I'm lenient on personal insults... but you start dragging family and friends in, and you will find yourself going away very quickly.

(For example, I'd only possibly infract someone if the victim of the insult reported the post.  That is the threshold.  When a person feels insulted.  Not when Inks thinks someone might have been slighted)

[Antonio the Sixth]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

[PJ]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

Krazen has indirectly insulted a number of family members and friends. I would support his banning.

Indirectly. But its cool with you if child porn is linked "indirectly" or that Opebo can post his exploits "indirectly."

Did I say anything about Opebo or 20RP12? No, and this has nothing to do with them. I don't believe Krazen should be infracted because he's conservative. I believe he should be infracted because everytime he calls the working class "leeches" or "moochers" I am insulted. I have friends who are on food stamps. My grandparents were dirt poor. My aunt may not be able to acquire enough money to retire in a few years. Krazen insults all of those people in my life when he complains about how they're "lazy." This is not an ideological circle-jerk. This is common sense infracting for someone who is either trolling or not thinking about how cold-hearted their words are towards a multitude of people.

[Cassius]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

Krazen has indirectly insulted a number of family members and friends. I would support his banning.

Indirectly. But its cool with you if child porn is linked "indirectly" or that Opebo can post his exploits "indirectly."

Did I say anything about Opebo or 20RP12? No, and this has nothing to do with them. I don't believe Krazen should be infracted because he's conservative. I believe he should be infracted because everytime he calls the working class "leeches" or "moochers" I am insulted. I have friends who are on food stamps. My grandparents were dirt poor. My aunt may not be able to acquire enough money to retire in a few years. Krazen insults all of those people in my life when he complains about how they're "lazy." This is not an ideological circle-jerk. This is common sense infracting for someone who is either trolling or not thinking about how cold-hearted their words are towards a multitude of people.

So tell me PJ, what do yo think of the activities of the Guillotine Marketing Board on this forum. Do you not think that what you've just said about Krazen equally applies to them? I mea, if we're bringing up family, the vast majority of my family and my good self would have been put to death were they being serious (and I'm sure a couple are). I have no problem with that, since political discourse never has and never will be a particularly nice thing where people sit around complementing each other on how nice they are. It's almost a bloodsport. Now I do agree that genuine attacks on family members should be punishable offense, but, on the other hand, you cannot make statements like this without taking into account people who say similar things but from a different angle.

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

The opposite of father, the opposite of more, dot com.

PLEASE DON'T BAN ME FOR THIS

Yeah, I just told them via PM.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Guess they shut it down.

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

You typed .dom? It's .com

[PJ]

Definately not. If anyone should be banned, it should be Krazen.

Why? Because he disagrees with you?

Krazen has indirectly insulted a number of family members and friends. I would support his banning.

Indirectly. But its cool with you if child porn is linked "indirectly" or that Opebo can post his exploits "indirectly."

Did I say anything about Opebo or 20RP12? No, and this has nothing to do with them. I don't believe Krazen should be infracted because he's conservative. I believe he should be infracted because everytime he calls the working class "leeches" or "moochers" I am insulted. I have friends who are on food stamps. My grandparents were dirt poor. My aunt may not be able to acquire enough money to retire in a few years. Krazen insults all of those people in my life when he complains about how they're "lazy." This is not an ideological circle-jerk. This is common sense infracting for someone who is either trolling or not thinking about how cold-hearted their words are towards a multitude of people.

So tell me PJ, what do yo think of the activities of the Guillotine Marketing Board on this forum. Do you not think that what you've just said about Krazen equally applies to them? I mea, if we're bringing up family, the vast majority of my family and my good self would have been put to death were they being serious (and I'm sure a couple are). I have no problem with that, since political discourse never has and never will be a particularly nice thing where people sit around complementing each other on how nice they are. It's almost a bloodsport. Now I do agree that genuine attacks on family members should be punishable offense, but, on the other hand, you cannot make statements like this without taking into account people who say similar things but from a different angle.

For one thing, it is pretty much consensus that Krazen is a troll.

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

Has he been banned?

[Thomas D]

Has he been banned?

Voluntary leave of absence.

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

Cue the socks.

[opebo]

How could anyone know what other sites contain?

Anyway he didn't post a link, he just mentioned the name.