Congressional districts with no large urban centers (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:45:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Congressional districts with no large urban centers (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Congressional districts with no large urban centers  (Read 1204 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


« on: January 02, 2014, 03:20:30 PM »

KY 5 0.2%. Can anyone tell me where exactly these 1222 people live?
Probably in Catlettsburg or Cannonsburg, Boyd County, which is in the Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH Urbanized Area.  Southern parts of Boyd County were added to the district in the 2010 redistricting.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
OK-02 encroaches on Tulsa.  A very small portion of the Tulsa Urbanized Area crosses into OK-02, probably near Owasso.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2014, 04:34:30 PM »

Cannonsburg (and some immediate surrounds; 1222 is slightly more than the CDP's population) is correct. Catlettsburg city is in KY-4 (and has more than 1222 inhabitants.)

Someone should tell Hal Rogers that Catlettsburg is in KY-04.  His website claims "Boyd County was split during the Kentucky legislature's 2012 Congressional redistricting process, placing the county seat, Catlettsburg and a southern rural portion of the county in Congressman Rogers service area".
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2014, 09:47:34 PM »

The city of Tupelo counts as an urban area under your "50,000 definition".  Metro population is close to 140,000, making it the nation's 8th largest micropolitan statistical areas.

Tupelo has long been the economic engine of North Mississippi, not DeSoto County. 

The fact that Tupelo is in a micropolitan area, not a metropolitan area, means that Tupelo and all nearby urban areas are classified as urban clusters (2,500-49,999 population), not urbanized areas (50,000+ population).  The Tupelo urban cluster had a population of 40,995 in 2010.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2014, 11:01:32 PM »

The city of Tupelo counts as an urban area under your "50,000 definition".  Metro population is close to 140,000, making it the nation's 8th largest micropolitan statistical areas.

Tupelo has long been the economic engine of North Mississippi, not DeSoto County.  

The fact that Tupelo is in a micropolitan area, not a metropolitan area, means that Tupelo and all nearby urban areas are classified as urban clusters (2,500-49,999 population), not urbanized areas (50,000+ population).  The Tupelo urban cluster had a population of 40,995 in 2010.

Its certainly netted 5 people since 2010.  

It (the Tupelo urban cluster) would have to had net 9,005 people to be considered an urbanized area.  I doubt the urban cluster grew by 20% in 2 years.

The urbanized area in MS-01 is Memphis' Mississippi suburbs and exurbs, which have a population of 128,310.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.