Congressman Aaron Schock outed? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:56:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Congressman Aaron Schock outed? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Congressman Aaron Schock outed?  (Read 13540 times)
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


« on: January 05, 2014, 12:31:49 PM »

I'm not really an authority on this topic, but aren't there gay people out there who actually believe being gay is a choice? I was having this discussion with a bisexual friend of mine, and he compared liking men to "liking broccoli"—he can't recall actively choosing to like broccoli, but he doesn't think he was born liking it. He says his sexuality is similar, and that comparing sexuality to vegetables only seems inappropriate because society has attached undue importance to the type of people we're interested in. He thinks everyone is bi. I don't know if I agree, but I think it's a credible line of thought.



As a straight male, I find bacon and cheese to be delicious, and can really only tolerate broccoli if it's smothered in cheese, or asparagus if it's wrapped in bacon.  Also, as a child I wouldn't eat rhubarb pie, because I knew what rhubarb looked like and the thought of it being in a pie was appalling.  Of course, I eventually discovered that rhubarb, especially with strawberry or blackberry or blueberry, is delicious in a pie and will go to great lengths to obtain such even in a region where it's not readily available.

Hope that clears things up.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2014, 11:07:03 AM »

If he's ever outed, he'll just give this lame excuse about how his personal and professional life should be separate - and in most cases they should be, but not in a case like this. "Sure, I bang guys in the shower and hit every gay bar that I can, but that's my personal life, I just vote against gay rights at every opportunity because that's my professional career. There's a big difference."

Suppose a politician enjoys gambling, goes to casinos and horse tracks and views gambling as a legitimate business, but that politician represents an area that is strongly opposed to gambling. Would it be hypocritical for that politician to vote against all pro-gambling bills? Who does the politician represent when they vote - the voters in the politician's district or the politician's personal beliefs?

Do his constituents know he gambles?  They may view that as a moral defect, or makes the representative more prone to bribing or being bought by special interests.  Supposes a Congressman opposes abortion and wants it outlawed, but he's buying abortions for every two-bit hussy he's knocked up?  Should his constituents know about that?  Let's say there is a certain segment of Schock's constituency that believe the gays are evil and are going to hell, should they get to know that they are voting for satan's spawn?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.