Primary Map: Christie vs Paul
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 03:40:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Primary Map: Christie vs Paul
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Primary Map: Christie vs Paul  (Read 700 times)
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 06, 2014, 10:47:16 PM »

Let's say only Chris Christie and Rand Paul are the top-teir candidates that win states in the 2016 primary. What does the map look like?
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2014, 10:50:49 PM »

Made this really quick, but something like this.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2014, 01:59:14 AM »

Christie/Paul

Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,268
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2014, 10:06:46 PM »



Paul manages to win the Iowa Caucuses with a small plurality; his best performances are confined to small caucus states (Alaska, Maine, Kansas) and to states where the far-right Republican Party is strongly against Christie (Oklahoma and Louisiana). The evangelicals and SoCons who dominate the Missouri GOP feel they have no candidate who speaks for them, and a plurality of caucus-goers choose "Unpledged." Paul withdraws from the race at the end of April, allowing Christie to win the later contests like Utah and South Dakota with 70+ percent of the vote.
Logged
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2014, 10:46:48 PM »



Paul manages to win the Iowa Caucuses with a small plurality; his best performances are confined to small caucus states (Alaska, Maine, Kansas) and to states where the far-right Republican Party is strongly against Christie (Oklahoma and Louisiana). The evangelicals and SoCons who dominate the Missouri GOP feel they have no candidate who speaks for them, and a plurality of caucus-goers choose "Unpledged." Paul withdraws from the race at the end of April, allowing Christie to win the later contests like Utah and South Dakota with 70+ percent of the vote.

I honestly think a Christie-Paul race could be interesting! Rand decides to focus on winning every single caucus state and does so (Iowa, Nevada, Maine, Minnesota, Colorado, Alaska, Idaho, North Dakota, Missouri, Kansas, Guam, American Samoa, Virgin Islands, Marianas, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nebraska, Montana, Wyoming), he also creates a strong wall in the South, winning Kentucky and Texas thanks to the Paul brand name and wins neighboring states New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Tennessee, Indiana, Virginia, West Virginia, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.