Clinton & McCain caucus performances
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:21:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Clinton & McCain caucus performances
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton & McCain caucus performances  (Read 1586 times)

excelsus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 692
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 07, 2014, 02:23:21 PM »
« edited: January 07, 2014, 02:24:56 PM by excelsus »

Why did Clinton and McCain perform so poorly in caucus states?
There was only one caucus each they won.
However, McCain only won Washington (and Puerto Rico) after every serious candidate had dropped out, and Clinton won Nevada, but even there she didn't receive a plurality of delegates.

Why do you think this is?



Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2014, 02:26:19 PM »

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2014, 04:25:33 PM »

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
I think this is absolutely correct.
Logged

excelsus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 692
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2014, 04:32:34 PM »

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
I think this is absolutely correct.

Okay, I understand why Obama could mobilize his grassroot supporters.
But why didn't McCain have any? I thought there were millions of supporters who had been eager for decades to vote for him.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2014, 04:40:36 PM »

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
I think this is absolutely correct.

Okay, I understand why Obama could mobilize his grassroot supporters.
But why didn't McCain have any? I thought there were millions of supporters who had been eager for decades to vote for him.

Maybe, but not in the conservative Interior West, especially against the support 2008 Romney was apparently getting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.