Opinion of Oklahoma

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Abstaining for Maxwell's sake.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

This place is a right wing hellhole.

This. Not one redeeming quality about OK.

I was applying that to the Atlas for the disgusting results of the NJ poll... But yes, this can apply to Oklahoma as well.

You don't think there are reasons to dislike New Jersey other than being right-wing?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

This place is a right wing hellhole.

This. Not one redeeming quality about OK.

I was applying that to the Atlas for the disgusting results of the NJ poll... But yes, this can apply to Oklahoma as well.

You don't think there are reasons to dislike New Jersey other than being right-wing?

No... But only a right wing hellhole of a forum would look at NJ, give it a clear majority for negative, and then sing the praises of Idaho and North Dakota. 

Because right wingers love California, Massachusetts, Illinois, and New York. And they hate Mississippi, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kansas, and Arizona.

California, Mass., Illinois, and New York have lily white rich suburbs that this conservative bastion loves.

So does New Jersey.

EDIT: Scott beat me to it.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

This place is a right wing hellhole.

This. Not one redeeming quality about OK.

I was applying that to the Atlas for the disgusting results of the NJ poll... But yes, this can apply to Oklahoma as well.

You don't think there are reasons to dislike New Jersey other than being right-wing?

No... But only a right wing hellhole of a forum would look at NJ, give it a clear majority for negative, and then sing the praises of Idaho and North Dakota. 

Because right wingers love California, Massachusetts, Illinois, and New York. And they hate Mississippi, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kansas, and Arizona.

California, Mass., Illinois, and New York have lily white rich suburbs that this conservative bastion loves.  Let me be perfectly clear: If you do not love New Jersey, YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2013/08/top_10_wealthiest_towns_in_new_jersey_north_jersey_dominates_the_latest_list.html

Every state has it's share of evil, evil bastards.

What Scott is trying to demonstrate is that New Jersey doesn't, proportionally, actually have many if any fewer than California, Massachusetts, Illinois, or New York. I'm pretty sure it's in fact whiter and richer than California or New York, and richer though not whiter than Massachusetts or Illinois.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

This place is a right wing hellhole.

This. Not one redeeming quality about OK.

I was applying that to the Atlas for the disgusting results of the NJ poll... But yes, this can apply to Oklahoma as well.

You don't think there are reasons to dislike New Jersey other than being right-wing?

No... But only a right wing hellhole of a forum would look at NJ, give it a clear majority for negative, and then sing the praises of Idaho and North Dakota. 

Because right wingers love California, Massachusetts, Illinois, and New York. And they hate Mississippi, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kansas, and Arizona.

California, Mass., Illinois, and New York have lily white rich suburbs that this conservative bastion loves.  Let me be perfectly clear: If you do not love New Jersey, YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2013/08/top_10_wealthiest_towns_in_new_jersey_north_jersey_dominates_the_latest_list.html

Every state has it's share of evil, evil bastards.

What Scott is trying to demonstrate is that New Jersey doesn't, proportionally, actually have many if any fewer than California, Massachusetts, Illinois, or New York. I'm pretty sure it's in fact whiter and richer than California or New York, and richer though not whiter than Massachusetts or Illinois.

Nathan... Look at the bolded bit. I'm not being serious

I know, I know. Reacting to obvious humor as if it's serious is part of my own sense of humor.