Why did Mondale do so (comparatively) well in Tennessee?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 07:38:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Mondale do so (comparatively) well in Tennessee?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Mondale do so (comparatively) well in Tennessee?  (Read 1836 times)
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,606
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 07, 2014, 09:00:43 PM »

This links to the 1984 map - Democratic share of the vote:

https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/index.html


Every single state that borders Tennessee(and the entire South. Actually every state that was Bush in 2004, except in the NE) broke >60% for Reagan, but Mondale held Reagan under 60%.

Why is this?
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2014, 09:14:50 PM »

Reagan barely won Shelby and Davidson counties (50-49 and 52-47) and Reagan did poor in many of the rural baptist areas in western Tennessee. Of course he nailed down eastern Tennessee, but I'm guessing back then western Tennessee made up a bigger size of the population than now.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,146
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2014, 09:43:12 AM »

Blue dog support.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2014, 10:06:20 AM »

Mondale was a reasonable Democrat.  He would have governed the same way as Teddy Kennedy had it not been for his defeat to Carter. Mondale was tied to tax increases cause of he was always under Carter and less recognizable. Teddy Kennedy would of said the samething as Mondale and wouldn't been punished about taxes. His share of vote was left over from Blue dog support from Carter.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2014, 10:31:40 AM »

Looks like he did reasonably well in Memphis/western TN and didn't slip that much in the east. For some reason, the bottom fell out from under him in middle TN, as that area swung heavily R:

Swing:


Trend:


The state as a whole trended almost 8 points R, which was more than I expected just by looking at the map.

Kinda odd because within the past decade or so, middle TN was really the last rural region of the state to go Republican.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2014, 12:17:37 PM »

Reverse coattails from Al Gore, perhaps?
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2014, 12:28:07 PM »

Mondale probably did somewhat decent in Tennesse due to residual support from Blue Dog Democrats and reverse coattails from Al Gore's successful Senate bid. What surprises me is how Reagan only recieved 70% of the vote in Sevier County, which previously gave Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon 85% of the vote.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,691
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2014, 05:19:21 PM »

Mondale was a reasonable Democrat.  He would have governed the same way as Teddy Kennedy had it not been for his defeat to Carter. Mondale was tied to tax increases cause of he was always under Carter and less recognizable. Teddy Kennedy would of said the samething as Mondale and wouldn't been punished about taxes. His share of vote was left over from Blue dog support from Carter.

If anything the Carter connection probably helped him.  Carter came close to winning the state in 1980.  Teddy Kennedy in 1984 would have sunk worse than Mondale in the South.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2014, 05:41:45 PM »

Mondale probably did somewhat decent in Tennesse due to residual support from Blue Dog Democrats and reverse coattails from Al Gore's successful Senate bid. What surprises me is how Reagan only recieved 70% of the vote in Sevier County, which previously gave Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon 85% of the vote.

Its fascinating watching the rural white democratic counties disappear and the massive republican trend over the years.

1980:




Reagan: 48.7%
Carter: 48.4%

1984:



Reagan: 57.8%
Mondale: 41.6%

1988:




Bush: 57.9%
Dukakis: 41.5%

1992:





Clinton: 47.1%

Bush: 42.4%

1996:



Clinton: 48.0%
Dole: 45.6%

2000:




Bush: 51.1%
Gore: 47.3%

2004:



Bush: 56.8%
Kerry: 42.5%

2008:



McCain: 56.9%
Obama: 41.8%

2012:



Romney: 59.5%
Obama: 39.1%
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2014, 11:14:42 PM »

Could it be because the TVA was more important there?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.3 seconds with 12 queries.