MW Biofuels Act (Passed)

[Lumine]

I'm all for this, but I have a few doubts: First: "By January 1, 2020, at-least 50% of all vehicles sold in the Midwest shall be able to run on 100% biofuel.", is there any way to enforce this in a more direct way? Second, why the October tax break? (I don't oppose a tax break here, I'm just curious).

Also, I wish to offer an amendment on grammar grounds:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Lumine]

I'm not sure about random audits, I imagine the psychological effect wouldn't be strong enough to force people to make those changes. Six years are a long time, but perhaps not long enough for some, which I why I feel we have to come up with a mechanism. Perhaps we could use an annual Vehicle inspection for that effect?

[Lumine]

Hmmmmm...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

How about this?

[Lumine]

Very well, any thoughts on how to change it from Arturo or Cris?

[Lumine]

Hmmmmm... The amendment might pass, but still, we have two Representatives now, so we need both of them to vote in favor. Now, if we were to push the deadline a few more years into the future and reduce the bill, would that suffice?

[Lumine]

GAworth's vote is valid?

Of course, he still has to swear in as the SoIA.

[Lumine]

Very well, I might offer another amendment to correct section two, but since the election ends tonight, we might as well wait until Brewer is a Representative to see if he has any thoughts on this. In the meantime, am I the only one interested in amending section two or do the rest of the Althing think it's fine that way?

[Lumine]

Hmmmm... In case no other amendment is proposed or if Brewer has nothing to say after swearing in, I'll offer an amendment removing section 2.

[Lumine]

Hello? Anybody there?

You must be logged in to read this quote.