If you want a good laugh....

[Psychic Octopus]

Cringe comedy. But you can't argue with these sorts of people; you've already won your argument, but it doesn't fit their "beliefs," so instead they're just lashing back at you with no substance claims. Sad yet funny.

[PJ]

Wow. Just wow.

[Pessimistic Antineutrino]

lol JRP and Flo aren't even posting on that thread anymore and they're still fighting. One guy says that Democrats better watch out in "Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New Hampshire or even freaking New Jersey because GOP 3:16 says your going to get your Senatorial majority asses kicked!"

You know, aside from the fact that Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Connecticut don't have Senate races this year...

[JRP1994]

lol JRP and Flo aren't even posting on that thread anymore and they're still fighting. One guy says that Democrats better watch out in "Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New Hampshire or even freaking New Jersey because GOP 3:16 says your going to get your Senatorial majority asses kicked!"

You know, aside from the fact that Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Connecticut don't have Senate races this year...

I just asked them, "How can the Dems get their assess kicked in 3 states (WI, PA, and CT) that aren't holding Senate elections next election cycle?"

This should be good.

[Linus Van Pelt]

It should be kept in mind, when communicating in venues other than the Atlas Forum, that the definition of "trend" used on here is an idiosyncratic usage of Dave Leip's, and not the usual definition used by statisticians and the rest of the world. The Atlas definition of "trend" is just as short-term as "swing" - calculated from only two elections - but it's relativized to the national average (so by mathematical definition the nation as a whole doesn't "trend" at all). By contrast, what is usually meant by "trend" (as measured by a linear regression, for example), is longer-term than just two data points, but not relativized to any larger average such as the whole country.

That being said, it does look like you were clear in your discussion here is specifying that what you meant was trend relative to the national average.

[MATTROSE94]

So wait, did someone seriously deny that blacks at the moment tend to favor Democrats by at least an 80% margin, numbers that are backed up by statistics?

HAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHHA

I guess those people are stuck in 1932, as that was the last year that any Republican Presidential candidate won the black vote.

[retromike22]

NO. We don't want any of them registering here.

Actually, we should start registering over there and take over their forum.

[JRP1994]

NO. We don't want any of them registering here.

Actually, we should start registering over there and take over their forum.

I like that idea.

[PJ]

NO. We don't want any of them registering here.

Actually, we should start registering over there and take over their forum.

I like that idea.

[SWE]

That would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad

[New_Conservative]

I think they are just trolling you to be honest.

[International Brotherhood of Bernard]

I think they are just trolling you to be honest.

I sincerely hope they are. No one's THAT stupid, right? RIGHT?