1972: Shirley Chisholm (D-NY) v. Pete McCloskey (R-CA)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 10:48:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1972: Shirley Chisholm (D-NY) v. Pete McCloskey (R-CA)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1972: Shirley Chisholm (D-NY) v. Pete McCloskey (R-CA)  (Read 1077 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 14, 2014, 02:36:22 AM »

Shirley Chisholm's unexpected ascent to the nomination occurred after Wallace endorsed her following her visit to him in the hospital.  She picked Gov. Jimmy Carter of Georgia as her running mate to provide balance.

When it was indisputably revealed two weeks before the convention that Nixon had indeed sabotaged peace efforts in 1968, the Republican Party was thrown into disarray and Pete McCloskey ended up winning the nomination after sixteen ballots after agreeing to keep Agnew on the ticket.

It proves to be a close race and while the Chisholm/Carter ticket receives a plurality of the popular vote, the electoral college proves to be its Downfall as McCloskey/Agnew wins 273 to 265



Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2014, 04:11:19 AM »

Did you post this just to link to another thread on the forum while using the word "downfall"?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2014, 02:38:03 PM »

Did you post this just to link to another thread on the forum while using the word "downfall"?

More specifically I posted it because of this: http://youtu.be/4Ente5ag_RU?t=2m49s
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2014, 03:23:47 PM »

Did you post this just to link to another thread on the forum while using the word "downfall"?

More specifically I posted it because of this: http://youtu.be/4Ente5ag_RU?t=2m49s


Gotcha, but why did you go this out of your way to do it?
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2014, 03:41:24 PM »
« Edited: January 14, 2014, 04:58:01 PM by badgate »

A majority voted NOT to ban opebo, yet he was still banned due to extra weight the mod's opinions hold. Just like a plurality voted for Chisholm yet she still lost bc of the electoral college. TF was [unintentionally] drawing a parallel between the hypothetical matchup in the youtube video and the whole opebo thing.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2014, 04:07:40 PM »

Did you post this just to link to another thread on the forum while using the word "downfall"?

More specifically I posted it because of this: http://youtu.be/4Ente5ag_RU?t=2m49s


Gotcha, but why did you go this out of your way to do it?

If you think I spent more than a few minutes on it or that I planned the results to have a deeper meaning, you're as deluded as badgate concerning what I intended.  It was just a quick little lark.
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2014, 04:21:19 PM »
« Edited: January 14, 2014, 04:56:40 PM by badgate »

I'm deeply disappointed in you, TF. I guess the nuance of the matchup's results is purely coincidental. Sad


Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2014, 05:08:34 AM »

True Federalist, I'm assigning you some homework. Write all sixteen ballots of the Republican National Convention.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.