Why did Michigan lose population from 2005-2007?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:23:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why did Michigan lose population from 2005-2007?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Michigan lose population from 2005-2007?  (Read 979 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 18, 2014, 01:57:40 AM »

I understand how Michigan lost population from 2008-2011 but 2005-2007 I don't understand. Was it because of the layoffs of workers from the Domestic Big 3 or 2.5 back then?
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2014, 09:36:38 AM »

Look up "One State Recession"

I don't think any of the big three went into the green during the 2000's expansion. Largely because the economy was so weak and most of the cars peopel were buying with the home equity lines of credit, were foreign. The hummer and other SUVs made money but rising fuel costs crimped that obviously. They had numerous brands though that were basically dead weight.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,244
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2014, 07:18:04 AM »

It was indeed the collapse of Detroit. The population has been falling for decades since its peak of 1.85 million in 1950. The last decade was particularly bad, with Detroit dropping from 951,270 in 2000 to 713,777 in 2010. In the past, the metro area would still gain (or at least remain steady) even with a declining population within city limits. That wasn't even the case from 2000-2010.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2014, 09:23:45 AM »

It was indeed the collapse of Detroit. The population has been falling for decades since its peak of 1.85 million in 1950. The last decade was particularly bad, with Detroit dropping from 951,270 in 2000 to 713,777 in 2010. In the past, the metro area would still gain (or at least remain steady) even with a declining population within city limits. That wasn't even the case from 2000-2010.

Chicago suffered a similar drop during the decade of the 2000's losing 200K residents. Chicago is a lot bigger than Detroit so the drop was a smaller percentage, but Chicago's loss was primarily in the black neighborhoods and those are roughly the same population as Detroit. The Chicago drop was steep enough to cause Cook county to also lose population, but some of the suburban counties were among the fastest growing in the nation (Kendall, Will) during the decade, so the state as a whole gained.
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,605
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2014, 02:06:52 PM »

The nation as a whole lost 3.8 million manufacturing jobs from 2001 - 2007, and then an additional 2.3 million during the Great Recession.



Probably a factor considering Michigan's reputation as a manufacturing state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.