Most Conservative Possible District by State
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:52:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Most Conservative Possible District by State
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Most Conservative Possible District by State  (Read 10514 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: January 29, 2014, 11:07:40 PM »

I'm surprised Ocean and Monmouth County didn't provide more fertile soil.
Logged
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: January 30, 2014, 03:00:37 PM »

I'm surprised Ocean and Monmouth County didn't provide more fertile soil.

There's more northwest than there is Ocean/Monmouth, basically, which allows you a couple percentage points of leeway when hunting for the best precincts.

Now, if you really wanna get crazy with the cheez whiz...



36.4% Obama, 35.0% Dem, with the caveat that the numbers are almost certainly not right in Lakewood Township.

All other districts were won by Obama and have a Dem average (generally not by that much though); 10 remains AA-maj and 12 Hispanic-plurality; no towns were split except between 10/12 and, well, what was necessary to make this insane-o-mander.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: January 31, 2014, 02:01:20 AM »

Wisconsin:



District went 62.7% McCain. Rest of state went 59.5% Obama.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: October 04, 2015, 08:14:53 PM »

Did anyone try Texas? That has got to be the most Repub CD possible anywhere.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,801


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: October 05, 2015, 10:27:57 PM »
« Edited: October 05, 2015, 10:58:19 PM by muon2 »

NE-3 in 2008 was over 68% from the EC, and was the most GOP jurisdiction there.

A look at the Atlas data shows that AL-4 was 76.21% McCain.
Edit: and by modifying AL-4 it I can get over 80% using 8 whole and 5 partial counties, and leaving room for AL-5 to the north.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,801


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: October 06, 2015, 06:49:18 AM »

Here's a fun one from TX. The blue CD is 82.1% McCain and only chops 3 counties. It completely surrounds a whole CD that is 69.8% McCain with only one county chop. Both CDs are within 300 of the quota as drawn.

Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: October 06, 2015, 06:48:10 PM »

Here's a fun one from TX. The blue CD is 82.1% McCain and only chops 3 counties. It completely surrounds a whole CD that is 69.8% McCain with only one county chop. Both CDs are within 300 of the quota as drawn.



You sliced Amarillo in half.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,801


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: October 06, 2015, 10:20:45 PM »

Here's a fun one from TX. The blue CD is 82.1% McCain and only chops 3 counties. It completely surrounds a whole CD that is 69.8% McCain with only one county chop. Both CDs are within 300 of the quota as drawn.



You sliced Amarillo in half.

Yes, but I followed the county line. Smiley In general I treat counties as superior to cities for the purposes of chops. Of course this was a very synthetic district, and Randall county was over 80% for McCain, while Potter was under 70%.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: October 07, 2015, 03:25:10 AM »

Here's a fun one from TX. The blue CD is 82.1% McCain and only chops 3 counties. It completely surrounds a whole CD that is 69.8% McCain with only one county chop. Both CDs are within 300 of the quota as drawn.



You sliced Amarillo in half.

Yes, but I followed the county line. Smiley In general I treat counties as superior to cities for the purposes of chops. Of course this was a very synthetic district, and Randall county was over 80% for McCain, while Potter was under 70%.
In the 1992 Democratic Richards-Frost gerrymander, they split every large county in west Texas (Lubbock, Tom Green, Taylor, Midland, and Ector. They didn't split Potter and Randall, but did put them in different districts.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: October 07, 2015, 12:32:47 PM »

I actually like the idea of suburban CD's surrounding inner city ones, say Marion County, Indiana, but of course not for rural CD's.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 12 queries.