Legitimacy of the U.S. Constitution
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:40:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Legitimacy of the U.S. Constitution
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Legitimacy of the U.S. Constitution  (Read 1139 times)
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 26, 2014, 10:18:13 PM »

Was the adoption of the Constitution at all legal under the Articles of Confederation or was it essentially a coup?
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2014, 10:44:10 PM »

Pretty much, except that the Articles required unanimous consent for alterations and the Constitution only required 9 out of 13 states to ratify it.  For whatever reason, nobody really cared at the time and all 13 states ratified the Constitution ultimately.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,410


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2014, 10:51:42 PM »
« Edited: January 26, 2014, 10:54:05 PM by asexual trans victimologist »

Yeah. It wasn't entirely aboveboard by the Articles' own terms until May 29, 1790 when Rhode Island ratified it, but it's hard to argue that it hasn't been since then. I've known certain very committed and doctrinaire libertarians to attempt to so argue anyway.
Logged
mb123
Rookie
**
Posts: 15


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2014, 03:04:32 PM »

     Patrick Henry said that it was illegitimate because they were sent to alter the articles and came back with a new consitution (which was like a coup). I used the line to derail a poli sci class debate about ratifying the consitution but the professor pointed out that the entire country had just had a rebellion against their monarch and coup-to-insititute-representative-govt was something everyone had recently participated in anyways.

 But like the previous posters said once all 13 colonies/states had ratified it was legitimate.
Logged
zorkpolitics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2014, 09:58:58 PM »

The articles were a compact among sovereign states, equivalent to a treaty.  In ratifying the Constitution the states formed a new country and gave up most of their soverenty to this new country, which superseded  the compact, making the Constituion fully legal
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,862
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2014, 10:55:45 PM »

Pretty much, except that the Articles required unanimous consent for alterations and the Constitution only required 9 out of 13 states to ratify it.  For whatever reason, nobody really cared at the time and all 13 states ratified the Constitution ultimately.

Even if only 9 states had ratified the Constitution, it still would have gone into effect - but only in those 9 states.  Short of 9 it would not have gone into effect in any state. 

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.