Natalie Portman (D) vs. Britney Spears (R)

[Cashcow]

You are clearly joking.

Would you vote for Hitler over Al Gore? Or George Bush?

We're obviously not talking about positions in this thread, just intelligence and qualifications. Who knows what Natalie Portman and Britney Spears actually believe?

[Fmr. Gov. NickG]

Natalie Portman went to my college, though I didn't know her (but my roommate fixed her computer once).  She's very small and pale in person.  I'd go for Britney easily if we're voting on looks.  Politics of course would be a different story, as with intelligence.  It's obviously easier for a celebrity to get into Harvard than a normal person, but not that easy.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

So you'd vote for someone with roughly 100 IQ points less than her challenger. OK.

Says the man who would vote for FDR over Herbert Hoover.

Both men were very smart. Britney Spears is a moron.

Hoover was at least 100 IQ points smarter than FDR. Hoover was an engineer who was a self made millionaire. FDR was a guy who never worked a day in his life who inherited millions from his dad and was a career politician. Yet FDR was still dumber than Hoover, but you would vote for FDR.

Explain why you would vote for someone 100 IQ points less than his challenger?

If Hoover was so smart, and FDR so dumb, how come FDR created so many jobs, and Hoover lost 9 million of them?

[TheWildCard]

As for where she showed her intelligence, see the first picture posted.

Point? You're proving my point BRTD I still have yet to see any real intelligence

[Fmr. Gov. NickG]

So you'd vote for someone with roughly 100 IQ points less than her challenger. OK.

Says the man who would vote for FDR over Herbert Hoover.

Both men were very smart. Britney Spears is a moron.

Hoover was at least 100 IQ points smarter than FDR. Hoover was an engineer who was a self made millionaire. FDR was a guy who never worked a day in his life who inherited millions from his dad and was a career politician. Yet FDR was still dumber than Hoover, but you would vote for FDR.

Explain why you would vote for someone 100 IQ points less than his challenger?

I doubt there could be a difference of 100 points.  Even an average president would have an IQ well over 100, and anything over 150 is pretty much considered a genius.  Even the greatest geniuses in history don't get much past 200.

[PBrunsel]

So you'd vote for someone with roughly 100 IQ points less than her challenger. OK.

Says the man who would vote for FDR over Herbert Hoover.

Both men were very smart. Britney Spears is a moron.

Hoover was at least 100 IQ points smarter than FDR. Hoover was an engineer who was a self made millionaire. FDR was a guy who never worked a day in his life who inherited millions from his dad and was a career politician. Yet FDR was still dumber than Hoover, but you would vote for FDR.

Explain why you would vote for someone 100 IQ points less than his challenger?

If Hoover was so smart, and FDR so dumb, how come FDR created so many jobs, and Hoover lost 9 million of them?

Call it being in the right place at the right time. FDR didn't create one job. The New Deal hurt our economy beyond belief and FDR knew this was going on. He had a political agenda that he wanted done through the New deal.

[Notre Dame rules!]

So you'd vote for someone with roughly 100 IQ points less than her challenger. OK.

Says the man who would vote for FDR over Herbert Hoover.

Both men were very smart. Britney Spears is a moron.

I'll bet that Britney has earned a hell of alot more money than Natalie has.  She can't be too dumb.  Britney probably knows that she isn't the brightest bulb in the package. Therefore, she would be far more likely to appoint intelligent people to run the different cabinet positions.  Natalie, on the other hand, probably suffers from 'Carter Syndrome.'   Believing herself to be the sharpest tool in the shed, she concentrates all authority around her, delegating nothing.  Natalie would fail miserably as President.

By the way, how smart can Natalie be?  Not only did she vote for Lurch, she actively campaigned for him.  That isn't too bright.   

[7,052,770]

I've read articles confirming Portman's intelligence, but I have no way of producing them here.  Anyway, Portman's is way more incredibly hot than the others, and gets my vote hands down.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

She's more intelligent than Britney Spears and this can be proven by this fact alone: She's not Britney Spears.

[Joe Republic]

By the way, how smart can Natalie be?  Not only did she vote for Lurch, she actively campaigned for him.  That isn't too bright.   

LOL, very funny.

Not too partisan, are we?

[Cashcow]

So you'd vote for someone with roughly 100 IQ points less than her challenger. OK.

Says the man who would vote for FDR over Herbert Hoover.

Both men were very smart. Britney Spears is a moron.

I'll bet that Britney has earned a hell of alot more money than Natalie has.  She can't be too dumb.  Britney probably knows that she isn't the brightest bulb in the package. Therefore, she would be far more likely to appoint intelligent people to run the different cabinet positions.  Natalie, on the other hand, probably suffers from 'Carter Syndrome.'   Believing herself to be the sharpest tool in the shed, she concentrates all authority around her, delegating nothing.  Natalie would fail miserably as President.

By the way, how smart can Natalie be?  Not only did she vote for Lurch, she actively campaigned for him.  That isn't too bright.   

Hahahahahahahahaha

[Notre Dame rules!]

By the way, how smart can Natalie be?  Not only did she vote for Lurch, she actively campaigned for him.  That isn't too bright.   

LOL, very funny.

Not too partisan, are we?

Partisan?   Who, me?