Alaska (PPP): Clinton leads Palin, trails other Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:18:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Alaska (PPP): Clinton leads Palin, trails other Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Alaska (PPP): Clinton leads Palin, trails other Republicans  (Read 1113 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 05, 2014, 04:42:30 PM »

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2014/02/alaska-miscellany.html

Clinton 44%
Palin 43%

Bush 47%
Clinton 39%

Paul 47%
Clinton 41%

Huckabee 45%
Clinton 41%

Christie 43%
Clinton 39%
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2014, 04:43:12 PM »

Funny crosstab note: More "very liberal" Alaskans want Palin to run for president than "very conservative" Alaskans.
Logged
Potus
Potus2036
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,841


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2014, 05:24:36 PM »

Bush does best. That's good.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2014, 06:35:15 PM »

Lmao palin.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2014, 12:04:00 AM »

Christie vs. Clinton by age:
18-29: Christie +10
30-45: Christie +14
46-65: Clinton +1
65+: Christie +1

Umm….
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2014, 11:57:50 AM »

Hillary polls much better in AK now than she did in early-2008 polling against McCain:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2008/polls.php?fips=2
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2014, 03:45:29 PM »

Alaska may be drifting Blue. McCain did about that well against Obama in 2008.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,041
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2014, 09:39:28 AM »

Funny crosstab note: More "very liberal" Alaskans want Palin to run for president than "very conservative" Alaskans.

Of course we want her to run because it would result in a near-50 state landslide for whomever the Democratic nominee is, Hillary or anyone else. Wasn't there a poll out that showed her only "beating" Obama by two points in UTAH?!

I think many Alaskans are starting to realize what an embarrassment she has become to the state, and they don't like it.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2014, 02:06:07 PM »

Funny crosstab note: More "very liberal" Alaskans want Palin to run for president than "very conservative" Alaskans.

Of course we want her to run because it would result in a near-50 state landslide for whomever the Democratic nominee is, Hillary or anyone else. Wasn't there a poll out that showed her only "beating" Obama by two points in UTAH?!

I think many Alaskans are starting to realize what an embarrassment she has become to the state, and they don't like it.

Sarah Palin's great electoral weakness is her inability to reach people whose first language isn't English. She does about as well in New England as other Republicans (not at all well), but where there are any large groups of people who learned another language first, she does badly. It's not because she talks 'above' them -- if anything she talks below them.

Her neologisms and mangled diction violate the basic rule of talking with anyone who is not a native speaker of English, no matter how adept that person may seem with English -- cleave to the formal register. Such is so whether the person's first language has many similarities to English (the Romance and Germanic languages) or something hugely different (any language of East or Southeast Asia).   
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.