What are the chances that Huckabee would beat Hillary?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:53:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What are the chances that Huckabee would beat Hillary?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
10% or less
 
#2
20%
 
#3
30%
 
#4
40%
 
#5
50%
 
#6
60%
 
#7
70%
 
#8
80%
 
#9
90% or more
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 72

Author Topic: What are the chances that Huckabee would beat Hillary?  (Read 2577 times)
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,280
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 18, 2014, 09:04:35 PM »

Your call.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,309
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2014, 09:19:49 PM »

Huckabee is one of the GOPs worst choices. He wouldn't do well outside of the south and solidly conservative states like Wyoming.
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2014, 09:20:50 PM »

Huckabee is one of the GOPs worst choices. He wouldn't do well outside of the south and solidly conservative states like Wyoming.
This, he is a nightmare of unelectabilty.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2014, 10:12:41 PM »

Less than 10%.  The country is moving away from the soc-cons. 
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2014, 12:12:26 AM »

I'm assuming this question involves a Mike Huckabee who was able to win a Republican presidential primary nomination. That's different from Mike Huckabee's current status quo.

He has polled well, and there are some things about him that offer a favorable contrast with Hillary. He fits a powerful theme of using government well, in contrast to the Democrats' typical big government message, and the Norquist theme of government small enough to drown in a bathtub.

However, he has significant weaknesses. He has major blind spots when it comes to interacting with people who aren't conservative Christians. A Huckabee who won the nomination have probably improved in that category, but not enough to be anything other than a slight underdog, unless the political environment is more favorable to Republicans than it is now.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,863
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2014, 12:28:44 AM »

Somewhere between 10 and 20 percent - an option that this poll does not include strangely enough.

The only reason it is so low is that such a case would have to require that Clinton and Huckabee both decide to run and emerge victorious from their respective primary battles, and then Huckabee would have to win-out.

It's too early to know how well Huckabee would do head-to-head against Clinton; while he may be a slight underdog in a "neutral" environment there are no such things as neutral environments in electoral politics.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2014, 12:37:01 AM »

He would only win if Hillary was suddenly revealed to be one of those flesh eating lizard people from "V," or if she was caught raping a child, or if it was discovered she had a secret love shrine to Maurice Clemmons and Osama Bin Laden.

He could also beat Hillary if the entire country suddenly turned into Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale."
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2014, 01:11:41 AM »

link

link

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/opinionnw/2013/12/18/mike-huckabees-maurice-clemmons-problem/

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=66077.0
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,142
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2014, 02:19:59 PM »

Mike Huckabee is not even notable let alone relevant.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2014, 02:29:58 PM »

As someone who met the man and shook his hand, you underestimate his charisma and charm. He is also a good debater and a good speaker.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2014, 02:32:03 PM »

The Evangelicons are fading away as the dominant fringe GOP group as the Tea Party takes over the role (although there is cross-over).

Less than 10%.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2014, 03:20:21 PM »

I think Katt Williams hit the nail on the head a few years back. Less than 10% chance.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,142
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2014, 03:32:40 PM »

As someone who met the man and shook his hand, you underestimate his charisma and charm. He is also a good debater and a good speaker.

I don't "underestimate" Mike Huckabee.

I dismiss Mike Huckabee.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2014, 04:21:05 PM »

As someone who met the man and shook his hand, you underestimate his charisma and charm. He is also a good debater and a good speaker.

This. Charisma, charm, and friendliness shouldn't be underestimated. Do I think he's a great candidate? Not particularly. But don't count him out. He's quite strong in the "he's one of us" category. He's very likeable and approachable. Those qualities shouldn't be underestimated. They're part of the reason Bush won while Kerry and Romney lost.

It would be kinda cool to have two Presidents from Hope, Arkansas as well. Tongue
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,280
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2014, 07:39:28 PM »

As someone who met the man and shook his hand, you underestimate his charisma and charm. He is also a good debater and a good speaker.

This. Charisma, charm, and friendliness shouldn't be underestimated. Do I think he's a great candidate? Not particularly. But don't count him out. He's quite strong in the "he's one of us" category. He's very likeable and approachable. Those qualities shouldn't be underestimated. They're part of the reason Bush won while Kerry and Romney lost.

Most people wouldn't consider talking about women's libidos 'charming.'  Even Bush was better at talking about sensitive topics than most prominent socons are today, and charisma isn't going to turn back the clock - especially if Huckabee insists on making the campaign about social issues.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2014, 09:08:19 AM »

As someone who met the man and shook his hand, you underestimate his charisma and charm. He is also a good debater and a good speaker.

This. Charisma, charm, and friendliness shouldn't be underestimated. Do I think he's a great candidate? Not particularly. But don't count him out. He's quite strong in the "he's one of us" category. He's very likeable and approachable. Those qualities shouldn't be underestimated. They're part of the reason Bush won while Kerry and Romney lost.

Most people wouldn't consider talking about women's libidos 'charming.'  Even Bush was better at talking about sensitive topics than most prominent socons are today, and charisma isn't going to turn back the clock - especially if Huckabee insists on making the campaign about social issues.

I believe there is a difference between talking about social issues like faith and family and talking about issues like contraception, woman's plight, ect ect
Logged
bballrox4717
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2014, 10:20:21 AM »

Huckabee is literally the worst candidate (even worse than Cruz, Paul) the GOP can put up against Hillary. It moves the conversation from areas the GOP is polling well on (the economy, healthcare) to the socially conservative debate in which the GOP has gotten their a**es handed to them the past few years. Can you imagine how big of a portion of the women's vote goes to Hillary once ads connecting Huckabee to Akin saturates the air for months? It'd be a bloodbath.
Logged
GLPman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,160
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 22, 2014, 01:02:20 AM »

Huckabee is literally the worst candidate (even worse than Cruz, Paul) the GOP can put up against Hillary. It moves the conversation from areas the GOP is polling well on (the economy, healthcare) to the socially conservative debate in which the GOP has gotten their a**es handed to them the past few years. Can you imagine how big of a portion of the women's vote goes to Hillary once ads connecting Huckabee to Akin saturates the air for months? It'd be a bloodbath.

Nailed it. I will put my head through a wall if the Huckster somehow gets the nod.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 22, 2014, 10:34:41 AM »

He'd win the south... and...
Logged
Randy Bobandy
socialisthoosier
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 22, 2014, 11:06:13 AM »

10% or less. This guy is the epitome of what is wrong with the modern Republican Party. 2004 is over, and social conservatism is no longer a plus anywhere outside the South and Utah.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 22, 2014, 11:12:08 AM »

Option 1.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 22, 2014, 01:43:18 PM »

10% or less. This guy is the epitome of what is wrong with the modern Republican Party. 2004 is over, and social conservatism is no longer a plus anywhere outside the South and Utah.

And some of the upper west (The Nebraskas, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho...).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.236 seconds with 15 queries.