AZ Legislature turns back clock, resumes segregation, but this time for gays (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:30:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  AZ Legislature turns back clock, resumes segregation, but this time for gays (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AZ Legislature turns back clock, resumes segregation, but this time for gays  (Read 12769 times)
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


« on: February 22, 2014, 04:17:13 AM »

Brewer called the bill controversial and noted it failed to pass in other states.  After 1070 and MLK I doubt she wants AZ to lead this charge.  Just look how local press is covering
http://www.azfamily.com/news/Many-fear-religious-freedom-bill-will-harm-Arizona-tourism-246640951.html
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2014, 02:37:03 AM »

Good, good. To be honest though, how easy is it to tell whether somebody is gay or not. I mean, sure, there's a few out there who set off the old gaydar, but realistically now. 'Tis pretty difficult sometimes.

That is a good point. In the good old days, when you put up your "whites only" sign, it was easy to identify any violators. Perhaps the fine AZ legislature will propose new legislation require the gays to wear something that identifies them, so that the fine religious people can be sure to not serve them. Perhaps some kind of armband?
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2014, 03:30:10 PM »

What AZ is proposing is actually worse than the "historically charged" segregation of the South. In that era of "separate but equal," businesses were offering separate services for whites and blacks. AZ is proposing that it should be legal to deny services entirely. The new law isn't protecting business from offering different services (like how Woolworth's in the south had separate counters for blacks), it is protecting business so they can deny gays service at any counter at all. It isn't sitting at the back of the bus, it is not being let on the bus to begin with.

Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2014, 10:53:48 PM »

How is this even a debate? Is anyone going to defend the right of businesses to refuse to serve people based on race, religion, sex or disability? (all of which are federally protected) Sexual orientation is just the latest thing to be added to the list (albeit in a patchwork of states and cities and not yet federally).

Unfortunately in AZ it is still legal to discriminate based on sexual orientation, so for most of the state this law really was meaningless. The real effect of this law was nullifying city ordinances in Phoenix, Tuscon and some other towns that had laws against LGBT discrimination. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.