Can politicians still be "honest" with people when things aren't good and win? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:12:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Can politicians still be "honest" with people when things aren't good and win? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Can politicians still be "honest" with people when things aren't good and win?  (Read 3653 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,662
« on: March 03, 2014, 02:40:58 AM »

I think in many ways Obama won in 2012 because he was being more honest with the middle class than Romney.  Obama was careful to present a long, hard slog on jobs and not to venture to close to happy days are here again territory.  Romney was promising the sun, moon and stars on the economy if only he were elected.  It was also a stroke of luck that there was just enough economic optimism in late 2012.  Romney would likely have won in either 2011 or 2013.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,662
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2014, 04:56:19 PM »


That's what I meant. I was correcting the guy who posted the map. Things were good in 1984, so that's not a valid example.

The best example of an incumbent party under-performing the economy in modern times is 2000 hands down.  The best example of an incumbent over-performing the economy is probably 2012.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.