House GOP Now Have a Tax Code Reform Plan
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:39:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  House GOP Now Have a Tax Code Reform Plan
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: House GOP Now Have a Tax Code Reform Plan  (Read 685 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,568
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 25, 2014, 12:57:00 AM »

Link.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2014, 01:14:46 AM »


What about Zelda? Tongue
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2014, 05:59:19 AM »

The GOP wants to drop the top tax rate down to 25% and close the budget hole. Joke party.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2014, 12:31:18 PM »

Flattening the tax code only has a remote chance of working if all tax dollars collected go 99 percent to the poor. 
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2014, 03:00:03 PM »

The GOP wants to drop the top tax rate down to 25% and close the budget hole. Joke party.

You don't know much about the tax code, do you?

The rate reduction would obviously be achieved by eliminating deductions, like mortgage interest deduction (corporate welfare). Furthermore, FICA tax is regressive, and many reformers have wanted to uncap the FICA system to stop bracket creep abuse of the middle class by federal administrators. This reform also appears to include a Buffet rule of sorts.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2014, 11:36:54 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So basically, they want to punish the sort of near-rich professional classes who have been part of the Democratic Party's "gentry coalition" in the Obama Era, while exempting their own base of farmers, extractors of natural resources, and the One Percent.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2014, 02:17:12 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So basically, they want to punish the sort of near-rich professional classes who have been part of the Democratic Party's "gentry coalition" in the Obama Era, while exempting their own base of farmers, extractors of natural resources, and the One Percent.
1 percent: George Soros, Lloyd Blankfein, and Jamie Dimon are part of the 1% and are Democrats.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2014, 02:18:05 PM »

Even the Romney plan was more comprehensive and plausible than this lazy excuse of a tax plan, and Herman Cain's far more interesting.
What 9/9/9?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2014, 02:20:07 PM »

Even the Romney plan was more comprehensive and plausible than this lazy excuse of a tax plan, and Herman Cain's far more interesting.
What 9/9/9?
Interesting doesn't necessarily mean good.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2014, 02:20:57 PM »

This is the same reform as 1986. Democrats may go for most of this with some modifications like they did in 1986 because it eliminates junk loopholes.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,500
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2014, 02:47:36 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So basically, they want to punish the sort of near-rich professional classes who have been part of the Democratic Party's "gentry coalition" in the Obama Era, while exempting their own base of farmers, extractors of natural resources, and the One Percent.
1 percent: George Soros, Lloyd Blankfein, and Jamie Dimon are part of the 1% and are Democrats.

Ok, but that doesn't mean that most super-rich Americans aren't Republicans.
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2014, 03:40:45 PM »

This is the same reform as 1986. Democrats may go for most of this with some modifications like they did in 1986 because it eliminates junk loopholes.

deductions are just corporate welfare anyway. The more deductions, the more forms to file. The more forms to file, the more people look to Turbo Tax, H&R Block, etc. Business capture a sizable chunk of the tax savings, and the push the boundaries of proper tax-preparation which reduces government revenues further.

Inefficiency doesn't help taxpayers, and deduction-based social-engineering is never as effective as promised.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 12 queries.