1916 Election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:37:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1916 Election
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1916 Election  (Read 4794 times)
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 08, 2004, 04:26:38 PM »

Hughes.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2004, 09:57:12 PM »

Wilson was the third worst president of the twentieth century, after FDR and LBJ.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2004, 03:32:09 AM »

Wilson was the third worst president of the twentieth century, after FDR and LBJ.

so how do you rate Carter and Clinton  lol
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2004, 05:24:19 PM »

Wilson was the third worst president of the twentieth century, after FDR and LBJ.

so how do you rate Carter and Clinton  lol

Carter would probably be a close fourth.  He was embarrassing and pathetic more than actively destructive.  But he was definitely Wilsonian in his foolish Idealism.  Clinton was actually not that bad for a Democrat, but that was entirely due to luck and a Republican congress.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2004, 05:29:18 PM »

Wilson was the third worst president of the twentieth century, after FDR and LBJ.

so how do you rate Carter and Clinton  lol

Carter would probably be a close fourth.  He was embarrassing and pathetic more than actively destructive.  But he was definitely Wilsonian in his foolish Idealism.  Clinton was actually not that bad for a Democrat, but that was entirely due to luck and a Republican congress.
ok
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2004, 04:07:30 PM »

Wilson
Logged
Neil.A
Rookie
**
Posts: 33


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2004, 01:21:40 PM »

Wilson
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2004, 02:27:39 PM »

benson.
if it was still fashionable i would be a socialist Tongue
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2004, 02:33:19 PM »

benson.
if it was still fashionable i would be a socialist Tongue

The Socialist went down in a flame after the 1930's. I wonder why? I know a large deal of American history, but I can't figure out why.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2004, 02:42:24 PM »

i think the socialists just drifted to the dems after '36.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2004, 03:13:11 PM »

Look at the results in Lake County, MN from 1912 to 1936
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2004, 03:45:06 PM »

i think the socialists just drifted to the dems after '36.


Makes sense...FDR was arguably a socialist.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2004, 04:13:01 PM »
« Edited: April 12, 2004, 04:14:02 PM by Michael Z »

The Socialist went down in a flame after the 1930's. I wonder why? I know a large deal of American history, but I can't figure out why.

Like Texasgurl said, FDR took up a large bulk of the Socialist vote in the 1930s, and most of them eventually moved over to the Dems. Then of course came the Cold War and the anti-leftist sentiment that went with it. I suppose that's the decline of America's Socialist movement in a nutshell.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 12, 2004, 06:01:55 PM »

Thanks everyone for the explanation. I guess I can check that off.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 11 queries.