National Journal Senate rankings
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:02:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  National Journal Senate rankings		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: National Journal Senate rankings  (Read 4284 times)
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2014, 05:13:18 PM »
Quote from: angryGreatness on March 03, 2014, 05:07:49 PM

I think that's the first time those words have ever been used in that order.
Krazen's posts are underrated. Of course he's a hyper-partisan republican, like some people here who are hyper-partisan democrat, maybe a bit optimistic for his party, but he hasn't bad political analysis.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,145
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2014, 05:17:40 PM »
Yeah, when krazen doesn't feel like trolling, he's actually quite knowledgeable (especially about redistricting).
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,683
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2014, 05:33:49 PM »
« Edited: March 03, 2014, 05:37:48 PM by OC »
The GOP are getting their analysis from www.electionprojection.com. They have partisan maps of Quinn and Peters losing.

As long as we have 50 seats, MI and NC will be the tie breaker, it seems.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 03, 2014, 07:05:34 PM »
Quote from: RogueBeaver on March 03, 2014, 03:22:36 PM
Completely agreed with MVAV. NC is purple federally, MI reliably blue. Remember when for a while Connecticut was close in 2012 and California in 2010? Yes those states are bluer but the same thing will happen. Peters will win as Dems come home in the fall. GOP is much better advised to invest in CO.

"Purple" NC is R+3 while "reliably blue" MI is D+4. I don't disagree that Peters is more likely to win than the polls currently suggest, but MI doesn't have that much of a Democratic lean. It's closer to the national average than it is to California, for instance (D+9).
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,145
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 03, 2014, 07:22:05 PM »
Quote from: OC on March 03, 2014, 05:33:49 PM
The GOP are getting their analysis from www.electionprojection.com. They have partisan maps of Quinn and Peters losing.

As long as we have 50 seats, MI and NC will be the tie breaker, it seems.

I have a very hard time believing that Begich and Landrieu will win and Peters and Hagan lose.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2014, 07:23:53 PM »
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 07:22:05 PM
Quote from: OC on March 03, 2014, 05:33:49 PM
The GOP are getting their analysis from www.electionprojection.com. They have partisan maps of Quinn and Peters losing.

As long as we have 50 seats, MI and NC will be the tie breaker, it seems.

I have a very hard time believing that Begich and Landrieu will win and Peters and Hagan lose.
I have the feeling they re going RCP: analysis out of touch based only on polls.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 03, 2014, 08:01:32 PM »
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 07:22:05 PM
I have a very hard time believing that Begich and Landrieu will win and Peters and Hagan lose.

Begich/Landrieu are better campaigners and retail politicians.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 03, 2014, 08:58:49 PM »
Quote from: Midwest Governor windjammer on March 03, 2014, 07:23:53 PM
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 07:22:05 PM
Quote from: OC on March 03, 2014, 05:33:49 PM
The GOP are getting their analysis from www.electionprojection.com. They have partisan maps of Quinn and Peters losing.

As long as we have 50 seats, MI and NC will be the tie breaker, it seems.

I have a very hard time believing that Begich and Landrieu will win and Peters and Hagan lose.
I have the feeling they re going RCP: analysis out of touch based only on polls.

Well, I'd prefer that over the pundits who pull their ratings out of their ass and ignore empirical data.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,683
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 03, 2014, 09:50:06 PM »
MI will come home to Dems. CO and AK will be the bellweathers of the night.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 03, 2014, 10:04:49 PM »
Quote from: Midwest Governor windjammer on March 03, 2014, 05:13:18 PM
Krazen's posts are underrated. Of course he's a hyper-partisan republican, like some people here who are hyper-partisan democrat, maybe a bit optimistic for his party, but he hasn't bad political analysis.

His attention trolling, offensive animal analogies, and blatantly racist innuendos outweigh any 'good' he brings to Forum.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,145
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 03, 2014, 11:39:51 PM »
Quote from: Mardi Gras Miles on March 03, 2014, 08:01:32 PM
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 07:22:05 PM
I have a very hard time believing that Begich and Landrieu will win and Peters and Hagan lose.

Begich/Landrieu are better campaigners and retail politicians.

Doesn't change the fact that their states are some of the reddest in the country.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 04, 2014, 01:51:14 AM »
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 11:39:51 PM
Quote from: Mardi Gras Miles on March 03, 2014, 08:01:32 PM
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 07:22:05 PM
I have a very hard time believing that Begich and Landrieu will win and Peters and Hagan lose.

Begich/Landrieu are better campaigners and retail politicians.

Doesn't change the fact that their states are some of the reddest in the country.

Yes, but both states trended strongly to Obama and candidate quality is important.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 04, 2014, 10:52:24 AM »
Quote from: Mardi Gras Miles on March 04, 2014, 01:51:14 AM
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 11:39:51 PM
Quote from: Mardi Gras Miles on March 03, 2014, 08:01:32 PM
Quote from: Sawxsylvania on March 03, 2014, 07:22:05 PM
I have a very hard time believing that Begich and Landrieu will win and Peters and Hagan lose.

Begich/Landrieu are better campaigners and retail politicians.

Doesn't change the fact that their states are some of the reddest in the country.

Yes, but both states trended strongly to Obama and candidate quality is important.

Though one because of the absence of Palin and the other because of black turnout.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 11 queries.