Which ex-Soviet republics would join a 21st century, non-communist USSR?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:14:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Which ex-Soviet republics would join a 21st century, non-communist USSR?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: If they all had to have referenda on joining a federation modeled along the lines of the Soviet Union, which ones would agree to it?
#1
Armenia
 
#2
Azerbaijan
 
#3
Belarus
 
#4
Estonia
 
#5
Georgia
 
#6
Kazakhstan
 
#7
Kyrgyzstan
 
#8
Latvia
 
#9
Lithuania
 
#10
Moldova
 
#11
Russia
 
#12
Tajikistan
 
#13
Turkmenistan
 
#14
Ukraine
 
#15
Uzbekistan
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 53

Author Topic: Which ex-Soviet republics would join a 21st century, non-communist USSR?  (Read 4401 times)
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,270
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 02, 2014, 02:50:34 AM »

Assume that such a union would provide more somewhat more autonomy to the individual republics than the USSR did and would not include Marxism-Leninism or a centrally-planned economy. It would, however, be (somewhat inevitably) led by Russia and wouldn't be any more democratic than Russia currently is.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2014, 02:53:26 AM »

You can only pick one option, but I'd guess Belerus, Kazahstan, and depending on who is in charge, the Ukraine are likely. I can't see the Baltic Republics wanting any part in that.
Logged
Nhoj
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,224
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.52, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2014, 02:56:05 AM »

Even though you only gave one option, belarus is really the only one that would anyways.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,270
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2014, 03:45:49 AM »

Damnit, I forgot to allow more than one option. Oh well.

My votes would have gone to Belarus and possibly Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2014, 03:51:56 AM »

Damnit, I forgot to allow more than one option. Oh well.

My votes would have gone to Belarus and possibly Kazakhstan and Ukraine.

You can fix that with the edit poll option, no?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2014, 04:39:12 AM »
« Edited: March 02, 2014, 03:27:19 PM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »

These 6 obviously, since they are members of the CSTO and are members or candidates of the Eurasian Union (no countries are just one or the other):
Belarus
Kazakhstan
Russia
Armenia
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan



Obviously not would be
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Georgia
Ukraine (with the new government)

Probably not:
Turkmenistan (not CIS)
Moldavia (pro Russia puppet state in their territory)
Azerbaijan (pro Russia puppet state in their territory)
Uzbekistan (withdrew from CSTO in 2012)

Edited my list
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2014, 10:22:33 AM »

Azerbaijan most certainly would not, with the Muslim-turkish speaking thing and all that. Armenia would I guess. I don't think Kazakhstan would though, because they tend to try to be as independent as they realistically can from Russia. I don't know a lot about Kirgizstan or Tadjikistan. Turkmenistan is at least politically built on the same model, but I don't know how they would react to that, especially if Kazakhs and Uzbeks stand in between (I don't think Uzbeks would join either).
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,219
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2014, 10:52:47 AM »
« Edited: March 02, 2014, 10:56:54 AM by Strategos Autokrator »

Those who would most likely join a new Soviet Union are the same ones wouldn't hold a free and fair referendum according to democratic standards. So, the point is moot.

As for an answer to the question:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_Security_Treaty_Organization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_Economic_Community

Which narrows it down to Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2014, 02:46:51 PM »

The dictator of Belerus openly wants to rejoin Russia IIRC.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2014, 02:50:04 PM »

Russia, may be. Nobody else, really, unless they are first occupied by Russia.
Logged
PiMp DaDdy FitzGerald
Mr. Pollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 788


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2014, 02:59:38 PM »

Russia, may be. Nobody else, really, unless they are first occupied by Russia.
I'm sure a few tinpot dictators could be found that would be willing to sell their people to Putin.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2014, 03:05:37 PM »

Russia, may be. Nobody else, really, unless they are first occupied by Russia.
I'm sure a few tinpot dictators could be found that would be willing to sell their people to Putin.

Why? If their country join Russia, they aren't ruling a country anymore.
Logged
PiMp DaDdy FitzGerald
Mr. Pollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 788


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2014, 03:09:22 PM »

Russia, may be. Nobody else, really, unless they are first occupied by Russia.
I'm sure a few tinpot dictators could be found that would be willing to sell their people to Putin.

Why? If their country join Russia, they aren't ruling a country anymore.
Dominican dictator Baez wanted to sell the Dominican Republic to the US in 1872 to avoid the hassle of ruling it and to profit off of his country. I'm sure if Yanukovich knew what was in store for his regime, he would have been more than willing to sell his country away. He already partially did it with the gas deal.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2014, 03:19:50 PM »

I could obviously see Belarus and Kazakhstan rejoining in the next if 5 years if the conditions are right. Eventually, Ukraine, Georgia and maybe Armenia could be brought in if in the next 5 years, if they are successful in Ukraine this year. I don't think anything else would go to Russia without it quickly escalating.

What are Putin's ambitions? How much risk is he willing to take?
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2014, 04:16:08 PM »

Russia, may be. Nobody else, really, unless they are first occupied by Russia.
I'm sure a few tinpot dictators could be found that would be willing to sell their people to Putin.

Why? If their country join Russia, they aren't ruling a country anymore.
Dominican dictator Baez wanted to sell the Dominican Republic to the US in 1872 to avoid the hassle of ruling it and to profit off of his country. I'm sure if Yanukovich knew what was in store for his regime, he would have been more than willing to sell his country away. He already partially did it with the gas deal.

The prestige of ruling a country in 1872 was very different than it's right now.
Logged
Franknburger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,401
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2014, 11:43:51 AM »

I could obviously see Belarus and Kazakhstan rejoining in the next if 5 years if the conditions are right. Eventually, Ukraine, Georgia and maybe Armenia could be brought in if in the next 5 years, if they are successful in Ukraine this year. I don't think anything else would go to Russia without it quickly escalating.

What are Putin's ambitions? How much risk is he willing to take?
Georgia? Never!
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2014, 07:06:52 PM »

Russia and Belarus and thats it.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2014, 07:45:22 AM »

Aside from Russia, Belarus, easily. If I could pick a second choice, Kazakhstan.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2014, 12:31:42 PM »

Back when the Soviet Union did collapse, I was thinking that the rump replacement would end up consisting of Russia, Byelorussia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine.  I saw no reason to think that it would expand beyond that. Up until recent events, the eventual reunion of all four was a possibility, but I see no way now that all of Ukraine would become part of Putinstan. Russia will likely gobble up Crimea and it may make a play for Eastern Ukraine, but not for Central or Western Ukraine.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2014, 12:58:08 PM »

Back when the Soviet Union did collapse, I was thinking that the rump replacement would end up consisting of Russia, Byelorussia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine.  I saw no reason to think that it would expand beyond that. Up until recent events, the eventual reunion of all four was a possibility, but I see no way now that all of Ukraine would become part of Putinstan. Russia will likely gobble up Crimea and it may make a play for Eastern Ukraine, but not for Central or Western Ukraine.

There was never any way of all of Ukraine being gobbled up by any sort of Russia - except by conquest. I was in Lviv back in 1990. Even then it felt almost more non-Russian then Tallinn. The only Russian we heard spoken on the street (when not addressing ourselves) was right after the Soviet Revolution Day celebrations, as the few participants were leaving the pro-Soviet manifestation with the red-and-blue flags of Soviet Ukraine.  In the woods around Lviv WWII was not over till 1953 (that is when the last remnants of the Ukrainian resistance were subdued).
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2014, 01:24:49 PM »

I didn't say that such a reunion would have been widely desired or embraced by the Ukrainian people.  But if Ukraine had gone the dictatorial way of Belarus to the north, it certainly would not have been unthinkable that a continued and/or renewed link between Little Russia and Great Russia would have happened.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2014, 09:56:44 AM »
« Edited: March 12, 2014, 12:00:21 PM by Stranger in a strange land »

Only Russia and Belarus. Kazakhstan won't: Nazarbayev likes ruling his own country, and it would never vote to rejoin Russia or the USSR in a referendum (though it wouldn't be overwhelming). However, if it gets invaded by Russia, then all bets are off.
Logged
Californiadreaming
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 25, 2016, 11:55:05 AM »

Assume that such a union would provide more somewhat more autonomy to the individual republics than the USSR did and would not include Marxism-Leninism or a centrally-planned economy. It would, however, be (somewhat inevitably) led by Russia and wouldn't be any more democratic than Russia currently is.
Either none of the above or only Belarus (if the leader of Belarus actually believes that he has a realistic chance of becoming the President of this new union state).

Indeed, nationalism can certainly be quite a powerful and potent force.
Logged
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,984
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 25, 2016, 12:57:10 PM »

Belarus obviously. But if it's a free referendum, the four southern central Asian States would probably also join, since it would be a significant improvement for them. Armenia is never going to join Russia voluntarily and neither are any of the others.
Logged
Californiadreaming
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 678
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 25, 2016, 01:17:34 PM »

Belarus obviously. But if it's a free referendum, the four southern central Asian States would probably also join, since it would be a significant improvement for them. Armenia is never going to join Russia voluntarily and neither are any of the others.
Isn't Turkmenistan already relatively wealthy rich now, though?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 13 queries.