Labor Party Standing Committee - FAREWELL (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:10:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Labor Party Standing Committee - FAREWELL (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Labor Party Standing Committee - FAREWELL  (Read 9529 times)
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« on: March 11, 2014, 05:09:25 PM »
« edited: March 11, 2014, 05:50:06 PM by Senator Tyrion »

I'll offer my hat for Regional Coordinator of the Pacific.

EDIT: Oops, turns out I was stepping on some toes. I'll withdraw my name.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2014, 04:33:27 PM »

Abstain
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2014, 05:43:23 AM »

The only remotely plausible solution to the activity problems of the Pacific is amalgamation with the Midwest.

This is a thing that I want to have happen, but I haven't had the time to spearhead it.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2014, 04:06:13 AM »

DemPGH leads 7-3 if my count is right. I think we should settle this soon.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2014, 02:06:26 AM »

Continuation
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2014, 04:45:39 PM »

Just a few words:

1. First off, I'm very disappointed that we lost one of our own in Cranberry. I understand that he was frustrated, but I hope that all who are frustrated with the system right now take steps to speak to someone. This hasn't been a period devoid of infighting or controversy, but I'd rather talk it out than see something explosive happen in what I thought was a fairly reasonable vote, which is a segue into my next point:

2. I think this vote is a perfectly reasonable way to evaluate our needs. If people by and large believe we need change (and the threshold is a rather low 25%), by golly, we'll change. I don't think that it's particularly odd to conduct a public vote; it's already clear that people have concerns, so I don't see why it's an issue to take the temperature of the room.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.