NC-PPP: Clinton leads all Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 09:36:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NC-PPP: Clinton leads all Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC-PPP: Clinton leads all Republicans  (Read 1100 times)
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 12, 2014, 11:44:20 AM »

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2014/03/north-carolinians-want-duke-to-pay.html

Clinton 47
Bush 46

Clinton 46
Christie 42

Clinton 49
Paul 43

Clinton 49
Huckabee 42
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2014, 01:34:37 PM »

It looks like a GOP disaster.

Could Hillary Clinton be putting together the Bill Clinton -- or even Jimmy Carter! -- coalition back together while keeping the Obama coalition intact?   
Logged
Potatoe
Guntaker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,397
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2014, 01:39:53 PM »

Please let Huckabee be nominated?
Logged
fartboy
Rookie
**
Posts: 76
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2014, 03:15:54 AM »

You consider those close margins to be leads? Have you ever followed a presidential election? Predicting whose going to win more than two years from now is like predicting when you'll take a dump two years from now.
Logged
senyor_brownbear
Rookie
**
Posts: 91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2014, 08:25:21 AM »

You consider those close margins to be leads? Have you ever followed a presidential election? Predicting whose going to win more than two years from now is like predicting when you'll take a dump two years from now.

Even if its close, the Republican lost a long time ago.  NC should be R+5 at a minimum.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2014, 10:28:20 PM »

You consider those close margins to be leads? Have you ever followed a presidential election? Predicting whose going to win more than two years from now is like predicting when you'll take a dump two years from now.

Those margins indicate that the Republicans would probably lose North Carolina in the next election unless something changes the dynamics of the political scene.  The burden of proof is on you to show that something will happen that makes these numbers a poor representation of reality. Sure, there is plenty of time for much to change between now and November 2016.


Hillary Clinton has learned much from her 2008 campaign. She will have the Obama campaign on her side -- and I have never seen as competent a campaign apparatus in my lifetime.

If you predict that Hillary Clinton will lose, then you had better explain how the suggested opponents will do better in a campaign.

Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2014, 10:10:09 PM »

Weird how Bush does the worst in Virginia but the best in North Carolina. Different pollsters but still.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.