Phelps vs. Thatcher vs. Bin Laden

[MATTROSE94]

Margaret Thatcher is the sane option.

[Oldiesfreak1854]

Margaret Thatcher is the sane option.

Especially because I'm not a hack.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

I don't think Phelps killed anyone, so I voted for him.

[Franzl]

Especially because I'm not a hack.

[Marnetmar]

Margaret Thatcher is the sane option.

[Randy Bobandy]

I don't quite understand this poll. Are you asking "who is least bad" or "who is worst"?

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

I don't quite understand this poll. Are you asking "who is least bad" or "who is worst"?

Least Bad

[Randy Bobandy]

I don't quite understand this poll. Are you asking "who is least bad" or "who is worst"?

Least Bad

Easily Phelps, then.

[Lincoln Republican]

How DARE you even put Thatcher in with those others.

She was a great Prime Minister and world leader.

[Mechaman]

How DARE you even put Thatcher Phelps in with those others.

Fixed

Phelps was by far the least destructive of the three.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

malvinas son argentinas

[Lincoln Republican]

How DARE you even put Thatcher Phelps in with those others.

Fixed

Phelps was by far the least destructive of the three.

Well, if you admire Fred Phelps so much, the leader of an extremist hate group, that's up to you.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Of the three on this list, only two openly preached hate.  Neither Fred Phelps nor Margaret Thatcher personally murdered anyone.  Bin Laden is definitely the worst of the three. I'm not going to sugarcoat this and say Phelps never actually harmed anyone, though.  No.  He harmed many people.  Thatcher - well, you can disagree with the way she ran her government, sure, but she didn't lay the foundation for what only can be compared to Klan rallies nor did she order her people to fly planes into buildings.  Love her or hate her, her intentions were nothing like those of the other two.

I voted Thatcher.

[Joshgreen]

How DARE you even put Thatcher in with those others.

She was a great Prime Minister and world leader.

You have got be joking. Oh, I looked at your sig and realized your whole persona is a joke. Next.

[Mechaman]

How DARE you even put Thatcher Phelps in with those others.

Fixed

Phelps was by far the least destructive of the three.

Well, if you admire Fred Phelps so much, the leader of an extremist hate group, that's up to you.

Well if you admire Maggie Thatcher, the leader of the Conservative Party of Great Britain that put into place policies that destroyed industries in the North of England, buddied up with Reagan's world policeman mentality, violently opposed to the Irish Republican movement (because how dare Catholics in Ulster think they have Civil Rights?) and play a hand in extending violence in the North for a decade longer than it would've otherwise lasted, demolishing social conditions in the country, and ushering in the war against worker's rights and unfettered endorsements of finance capital, then that's up to you.

I for one, would take a loudmouth homophobe who had no real influence outside of the hundred or so crazies who were in his congregation.  Any day of the week.

[Mechaman]

Of the three on this list, only two openly preached hate.  Neither Fred Phelps nor Margaret Thatcher personally murdered anyone.  Bin Laden is definitely the worst of the three. I'm not going to sugarcoat this and say Phelps never actually harmed anyone, though.  No.  He harmed many people.  Thatcher - well, you can disagree with the way she ran her government, sure, but she didn't lay the foundation for what only can be compared to Klan rallies nor did she order her people to fly planes into buildings.  Love her or hate her, her intentions were nothing like those of the other two.

I voted Thatcher.

While Phelps did rob people of their life's earnings in several lawsuits, I think it's insane to suggest that he harmed "many" people.  Especially compared to Maggie Thatcher, whose policies destroyed entire communities.

[Lincoln Republican]

How DARE you even put Thatcher in with those others.

She was a great Prime Minister and world leader.

You have got be joking. Oh, I looked at your sig and realized your whole persona is a joke. Next.

Oh, we have a little Mr. Smart Pants here I see.  

[Lincoln Republican]

How DARE you even put Thatcher Phelps in with those others.

Fixed

Phelps was by far the least destructive of the three.

Well, if you admire Fred Phelps so much, the leader of an extremist hate group, that's up to you.

Well if you admire Maggie Thatcher, the leader of the Conservative Party of Great Britain that put into place policies that destroyed industries in the North of England, buddied up with Reagan's world policeman mentality, violently opposed to the Irish Republican movement (because how dare Catholics in Ulster think they have Civil Rights?) and play a hand in extending violence in the North for a decade longer than it would've otherwise lasted, demolishing social conditions in the country, and ushering in the war against worker's rights and unfettered endorsements of finance capital, then that's up to you.

I for one, would take a loudmouth homophobe who had no real influence outside of the hundred or so crazies who were in his congregation.  Any day of the week.

Well, Mr. Flawless, anyone who can serve as Prime Minister for 11 consecutive years, winning three straight majority election mandates from the people must be doing something right.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Of the three on this list, only two openly preached hate.  Neither Fred Phelps nor Margaret Thatcher personally murdered anyone.  Bin Laden is definitely the worst of the three. I'm not going to sugarcoat this and say Phelps never actually harmed anyone, though.  No.  He harmed many people.  Thatcher - well, you can disagree with the way she ran her government, sure, but she didn't lay the foundation for what only can be compared to Klan rallies nor did she order her people to fly planes into buildings.  Love her or hate her, her intentions were nothing like those of the other two.

I voted Thatcher.

While Phelps did rob people of their life's earnings in several lawsuits, I think it's insane to suggest that he harmed "many" people.  Especially compared to Maggie Thatcher, whose policies destroyed entire communities.

He harmed people emotionally.  He kicked people when they were already on the ground, and he did it with full knowledge of his crimes and he did it because he wanted them to feel pain.  Thatcher's policies were destructive, but I don't think her intentions can be compared to those of Phelps.  Do you really think that a country under the power of Fred Phelps would be less bad than Thatcher's Britain?

How DARE you even put Thatcher Phelps in with those others.

Fixed

Phelps was by far the least destructive of the three.

Well, if you admire Fred Phelps so much, the leader of an extremist hate group, that's up to you.

Well if you admire Maggie Thatcher, the leader of the Conservative Party of Great Britain that put into place policies that destroyed industries in the North of England, buddied up with Reagan's world policeman mentality, violently opposed to the Irish Republican movement (because how dare Catholics in Ulster think they have Civil Rights?) and play a hand in extending violence in the North for a decade longer than it would've otherwise lasted, demolishing social conditions in the country, and ushering in the war against worker's rights and unfettered endorsements of finance capital, then that's up to you.

I for one, would take a loudmouth homophobe who had no real influence outside of the hundred or so crazies who were in his congregation.  Any day of the week.

Well, Mr. Flawless, anyone who can serve as Prime Minister for 11 consecutive years, winning three straight majority election mandates from the people must be doing something right.

That's, uh, some interesting logic there...

[Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook]

How DARE you even put Thatcher Bin Ladin in with those others.

Fixed

[Lincoln Republican]

The only thing this poll and commentary show is the extreme leftist bias of this forum.

[Lincoln Republican]

Of the three on this list, only two openly preached hate.  Neither Fred Phelps nor Margaret Thatcher personally murdered anyone.  Bin Laden is definitely the worst of the three. I'm not going to sugarcoat this and say Phelps never actually harmed anyone, though.  No.  He harmed many people.  Thatcher - well, you can disagree with the way she ran her government, sure, but she didn't lay the foundation for what only can be compared to Klan rallies nor did she order her people to fly planes into buildings.  Love her or hate her, her intentions were nothing like those of the other two.

I voted Thatcher.

While Phelps did rob people of their life's earnings in several lawsuits, I think it's insane to suggest that he harmed "many" people.  Especially compared to Maggie Thatcher, whose policies destroyed entire communities.

He harmed people emotionally.  He kicked people when they were already on the ground, and he did it with full knowledge of his crimes and he did it because he wanted them to feel pain.  Thatcher's policies were destructive, but I don't think her intentions can be compared to those of Phelps.  Do you really think that a country under the power of Fred Phelps would be less bad than Thatcher's Britain?

How DARE you even put Thatcher Phelps in with those others.

Fixed

Phelps was by far the least destructive of the three.

Well, if you admire Fred Phelps so much, the leader of an extremist hate group, that's up to you.

Well if you admire Maggie Thatcher, the leader of the Conservative Party of Great Britain that put into place policies that destroyed industries in the North of England, buddied up with Reagan's world policeman mentality, violently opposed to the Irish Republican movement (because how dare Catholics in Ulster think they have Civil Rights?) and play a hand in extending violence in the North for a decade longer than it would've otherwise lasted, demolishing social conditions in the country, and ushering in the war against worker's rights and unfettered endorsements of finance capital, then that's up to you.

I for one, would take a loudmouth homophobe who had no real influence outside of the hundred or so crazies who were in his congregation.  Any day of the week.

Well, Mr. Flawless, anyone who can serve as Prime Minister for 11 consecutive years, winning three straight majority election mandates from the people must be doing something right.

That's, uh, some interesting logic there...

Thank you for agreeing with my logic.

After all, if this leader was so horrible, there is no way they would be receiving such massive public support from the people in a truly democratic election.

[Adam Griffin]

Thank you for agreeing with my logic.

After all, if this leader was so horrible, there is no way they would be receiving such massive public support from the people in a truly democratic election.