Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2014, 10:39:38 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Bacon King)
| | | |-+  4-way White Male Presidential Shoot-out 2008!
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Who to vote for?
Sanford/Owens (Republican)   -17 (27.9%)
Bredesen/Bayh (Democrat)   -26 (42.6%)
Johnson/Thompson (Libertarian)   -12 (19.7%)
Kucinich/Camejo (Green)   -6 (9.8%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: 4-way White Male Presidential Shoot-out 2008!  (Read 5099 times)
DanielX
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5166
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

P
View Profile
« on: March 26, 2005, 09:58:55 am »
Ignore

Gov. Mark Sanford / Gov. Bill Owens for the Republicans.
Gov. Phil Bredesen / Sen. Evan Bayh for the Democrats.
former Gov. Gary Johnson / Ed Thompson for the Libertarians.
former Rep. Dennis Kucinich / Peter Camejo for the Greens or some other 3rd party who hate Bredesen.

Who gets your vote, among these candidates, all of which are white or largely white males? I'm leaning Sanford, although Johnson could convince me...
Logged

Yankee Capitalist Scum!
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1092


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2005, 10:39:18 pm »
Ignore

I'd vote Sanford, but Bredesen or Johnson would make fine Presidents as well.
Logged

Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31

My political view's summarized
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8715


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2005, 11:02:59 pm »
Ignore

I'd vote Bredesen for electability purposes, though Kucinich is closer to my ideology.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

a combination of tumblr leftism and moshing
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 70926
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2005, 02:03:09 pm »
Ignore

Bredesen.
Logged

Famous True Leftists:

King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23674
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2005, 08:47:32 pm »
Ignore

Johnson/Thompson
Logged

TexasGurl
texasgurl24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8156
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.57, S: -7.91

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2005, 05:12:31 pm »
Ignore

Not good choices at all.
Logged

Jake
dubya2004
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18732
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2005, 05:22:34 pm »
Ignore

Sanford, though Bedresen is an excellent choice.  Not quite sure Kucinich is a man, more like an dwarf.
Logged
Erc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4685
Slovenia


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2005, 05:32:43 pm »
Ignore

Ooooh...

White males...

How original...


Other than 1928, 1932, and 1984, are there any years where the four candidates from the two major parties haven't been white males?
Logged
Pictor Ignotus
TCash101
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6432


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2005, 05:53:47 pm »
Ignore

Bredesen.
Logged

Renew our Democracy!
a combination of tumblr leftism and moshing
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 70926
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2005, 10:21:52 am »
Ignore

Ooooh...

White males...

How original...


Other than 1928, 1932, and 1984, are there any years where the four candidates from the two major parties haven't been white males?

who were the non-white males in 1932 and 1928?
Logged

Famous True Leftists:

PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9631


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2005, 06:31:40 pm »
Ignore

Ooooh...

White males...

How original...


Other than 1928, 1932, and 1984, are there any years where the four candidates from the two major parties haven't been white males?

who were the non-white males in 1932 and 1928?

Charles Curtis was Hoover's VP and a Caw Indian.
Logged


"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
Platypus
hughento
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21313
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2005, 10:18:00 pm »
Ignore

Not good choices at all.


but i'd vote Bredensen.
Logged

Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18248
United States


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2005, 11:34:29 am »
Ignore

depends on the polls in MS at the time.  If Breseden has any chance at all, then I'd of course vote for him.
If he had no chance, I'd vote Kucinich just to screw with the MS establishment.
Logged
Gabu
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28563
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 24, 2005, 09:42:04 pm »
Ignore

Bredesen.
Logged



"To me, 'underground' sounds like subway trains.  That's the only sound I associate with 'underground'." - Everett
Rob
Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6321
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 24, 2005, 09:49:29 pm »
Ignore

They would both be great Presidents, IMO. It's basically a coin toss to see who I'd vote for, LOL.
Logged

Here’s what Sarah Palin represents: being a fat fucking pig who pins “Country First” buttons on his man titties and chants “U-S-A! U-S-A!” at the top of his lungs while his kids live off credit cards and Saudis buy up all the mortgages in Kansas.
farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2005, 08:14:44 am »
Ignore

Ooooh...

White males...

How original...


Other than 1928, 1932, and 1984, are there any years where the four candidates from the two major parties haven't been white males?

who were the non-white males in 1932 and 1928?

Charles Curtis was Hoover's VP and a Caw Indian.
One-sixteenth Kaw (aka Kansa) Indian actually. And another sixteenth some other Indian tribe (Osage?). I think that qualifies as a White Male.

Even though he was raised by his one-half Indian grandmother during part of his youth.
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29640
United States
View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2005, 08:44:24 pm »
Ignore

Ooooh...

White males...

How original...


Other than 1928, 1932, and 1984, are there any years where the four candidates from the two major parties haven't been white males?

who were the non-white males in 1932 and 1928?

Charles Curtis was Hoover's VP and a Caw Indian.
One-sixteenth Kaw (aka Kansa) Indian actually. And another sixteenth some other Indian tribe (Osage?). I think that qualifies as a White Male.

Even though he was raised by his one-half Indian grandmother during part of his youth.

Well, if that qualifies him as Native American, that qualifies me as purebred Native American. He was white.
Logged

n/c
Ronald Reagan
Spl2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 294
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2005, 12:35:03 pm »
Ignore


Bredesen - 231 - 46%
Sanford - 307 - 54%
Johnson - 0 - 4%
Kucinich - 0 - 3%

Kucinich really hurts Bredesen.  I don't know very much about Bredesen, but since he is from the south, Kucinich takes away votes from Kucinich in the north.  I used Missouri results 4 the percentages.
Logged

In principio creavit Deus caelum et terram. (Genesis 1:1)
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines