NM-PPP: Hillary with big leads
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 05:22:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NM-PPP: Hillary with big leads
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NM-PPP: Hillary with big leads  (Read 1106 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 27, 2014, 12:08:36 PM »

Martinez would trail Hillary Clinton 53/39 in a hypothetical contest in the state.

That does make her the strongest potential Republican candidate though.

Clinton would also lead Rand Paul 51/36, Jeb Bush 53/37, Ted Cruz 54/37, Chris Christie 53/35, and Mike Huckabee 55/34.

New Mexico hasn't been close in the last two Presidential elections and if Clinton runs that trend looks likely to continue in 2016.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2014/03/new-mexico-miscellany.html
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,930


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2014, 03:27:22 PM »

NM is gone for pubs, G.O.N.E
Logged
senyor_brownbear
Rookie
**
Posts: 91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2014, 03:54:53 PM »

Dang, how is Christie doing the worst (stop trying to make Huckabee a thing).
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2014, 03:58:52 PM »

Dang, how is Christie doing the worst (stop trying to make Huckabee a thing).

Simple. People don't like corrupt politicians. More caudillos like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld is the last thing people crave for in the 21st century.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2014, 04:00:26 PM »

Trailing by 14 and 15 is as close as the GOP gets to a state that Bush won, wow.

That being said, this makes Rand Paul look better and better.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2014, 04:15:12 PM »

NM is a solid blue state now.
Logged
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2014, 07:57:15 PM »


If Hillary wins it by this kind of margin, I'll agree.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2014, 08:30:11 PM »

Victory margin among Hispanics:

Bush vs. Clinton: Clinton +34
Christie vs. Clinton: Clinton +38
Cruz vs. Clinton: Clinton +39
Huckabee vs. Clinton: Clinton +45
Martinez vs. Clinton: Clinton +34
Paul vs. Clinton: Clinton +44

Victory margin among whites:

Bush vs. Clinton: tie
Christie vs. Clinton: tie
Cruz vs. Clinton: Clinton +1
Huckabee vs. Clinton: Clinton +4
Martinez vs. Clinton: tie
Paul vs. Clinton: Paul +5
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,697


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2014, 08:38:55 PM »
« Edited: March 27, 2014, 08:41:17 PM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »

New Mexico's bellwether days are over.  From 1912-2004, it only missed the 1976 election. Gore actually did worse there than nationwide.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,930


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2014, 11:05:48 PM »

Victory margin among Hispanics:

Bush vs. Clinton: Clinton +34
Christie vs. Clinton: Clinton +38
Cruz vs. Clinton: Clinton +39
Huckabee vs. Clinton: Clinton +45
Martinez vs. Clinton: Clinton +34
Paul vs. Clinton: Clinton +44

Victory margin among whites:

Bush vs. Clinton: tie
Christie vs. Clinton: tie
Cruz vs. Clinton: Clinton +1
Huckabee vs. Clinton: Clinton +4
Martinez vs. Clinton: tie
Paul vs. Clinton: Paul +5

LMFAO at Rand Paul among Hispanics. The buffoon actually thinks he can "grow the party". LOL
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2014, 05:54:12 AM »
« Edited: March 28, 2014, 01:07:26 PM by pbrower2a »

Victory margin among Hispanics:

Bush vs. Clinton: Clinton +34
Christie vs. Clinton: Clinton +38
Cruz vs. Clinton: Clinton +39
Huckabee vs. Clinton: Clinton +45
Martinez vs. Clinton: Clinton +34
Paul vs. Clinton: Clinton +44

Victory margin among whites:

Bush vs. Clinton: tie
Christie vs. Clinton: tie
Cruz vs. Clinton: Clinton +1
Huckabee vs. Clinton: Clinton +4
Martinez vs. Clinton: tie
Paul vs. Clinton: Paul +5

LMFAO at Rand Paul among Hispanics. The buffoon actually thinks he can "grow the party". LOL

Rand Paul is no more a buffoon than many other Republicans. For a real buffoon there is Sarah Palin, whose mangled diction confuses or offends anyone whose first language isn't English. That describes many in New Mexico, no matter how good their English is as a second language. (A basic rule: stay close to the formal register of English when talking to anyone who might not be a native speaker of English. Non-standard English confuses such people because it needs double-translation). He does not have the serial-marriage 'problem' that Newt Gingrich has.

New Mexico has the largest percentage of Hispanics in the US except perhaps for California. The GOP is losing middle-class Hispanics and needs to have one as the Gubernatorial nominee, and at that someone liberal by GOP standards, to win the state.

Rand Paul is Hard Right on economics if not on military issues...  that's not how to convince people who rely more upon formal education than upon ownership of property for success. In general any non-white, non-Anglo, and non-Christian segments of the middle class rely heavily upon education for qualifying for the work that they do.

Republicans have a better chance of winning Pennsylvania or Michigan than they have of winning New Mexico.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2014, 05:01:45 PM »

Sell NM back to 3rd world Mexico and buy Alberta for replacement.
Logged
senyor_brownbear
Rookie
**
Posts: 91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2014, 06:11:28 PM »

Sell NM back to 3rd world Mexico and buy Alberta for replacement.

Ted Cruz could finally be eligible.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.