Pacific Council: Rural Housing Act (Passed - Rewrite)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 07:44:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Pacific Council: Rural Housing Act (Passed - Rewrite)		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pacific Council: Rural Housing Act (Passed - Rewrite)  (Read 820 times)
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 17, 2014, 09:28:12 PM »
« edited: April 08, 2014, 06:49:54 PM by DemPGH »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Politics Junkie

Debate commences now, and I have to say that I'm a little concerned about what this will cost and the expansiveness of it.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,793
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2014, 09:39:43 PM »
We may need a GM analysis on this. This is to aid those who are homeless in our region. A larger amount of Pacificans are probably in this unfortunate position than usual, considering how extremely difficult it is to find a job. In addition, this will reduce unemployment because it is a huge boost in jobs for the construction industry.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2014, 09:14:12 PM »
Yeah, I really would be interested in a cost / benefit analysis on this one.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2014, 10:47:31 PM »
bump (I love it)
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2014, 12:28:42 PM »
I could support a really stripped back version of this, like section 3, or something in the way of assistance.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2014, 06:54:26 PM »
bumpity bump bump bumpity bump bump
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2014, 07:07:55 PM »
I have to say I am wary on this. Do we really have the money to build 20,000 new houses?
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2014, 05:54:23 PM »
Quote from: Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin on February 22, 2014, 07:07:55 PM
I have to say I am wary on this. Do we really have the money to build 20,000 new houses?

We do have the stimulus funding.
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2014, 06:53:47 PM »
Quote from: Flo on February 23, 2014, 05:54:23 PM
Quote from: Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin on February 22, 2014, 07:07:55 PM
I have to say I am wary on this. Do we really have the money to build 20,000 new houses?

We do have the stimulus funding.
I forgot about that. I withdraw my objection.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2014, 06:57:03 PM »
We should wait on this until a new GM pops up.
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2014, 12:03:43 AM »
Bump
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2014, 10:17:45 PM »
Since we have no earthly idea of what this is going to cost, I think we should begin a final vote. Any objections?
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2014, 03:03:30 AM »
Did you not receive data from the GM?
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2014, 06:44:13 PM »
Quote from: TheCranberry on March 22, 2014, 03:03:30 AM
Did you not receive data from the GM?

No, he's continuing a policy that doesn't let us know the costs of projects
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2014, 03:27:12 AM »
Ok. Then I think we should just vote.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 24, 2014, 06:09:39 PM »
I hate to interrupt the flow of debate here but while we're discussing stimulus funds, shouldn't some be used for the droughts physical/economic damage?  For strategies that will mitigate such future emergencies?   
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 24, 2014, 06:39:39 PM »
Good Lord, this is still out? I thought we had dealt with this.

I will support a stripped back version, but I don't see how as worded it is prudent. At least not without knowing the benefit of it.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2014, 03:41:30 AM »
We have 24 hours to vote. Please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain.
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2014, 03:46:26 AM »
Aye
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2014, 09:12:15 AM »
Aye
Logged
Fed. Pac. Chairman Devin
Devin
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 646
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2014, 11:43:12 AM »
Aye
Logged
Flake
JacobTiver
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 02, 2014, 05:28:39 AM »
The bill passes 3-0-0.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2014, 04:08:04 PM »
Okay, can we just strike Section 2? Will you guys go for that?

I can't justify building twenty thousand houses.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 08, 2014, 06:23:58 PM »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Okay, this is minimally what I want to do with this. What we need to do is make a "rural housing project" part of the stimulus.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.215 seconds with 13 queries.