Why haven't any states gone the unicameral, parliamentary route? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 11:26:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Why haven't any states gone the unicameral, parliamentary route? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why haven't any states gone the unicameral, parliamentary route?  (Read 3400 times)
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


« on: October 05, 2019, 03:36:47 PM »

One state is unicameral, Nebraska.

A parliamentary system doesn't work with the US's fixed election years, and while states don't have to use fixed election dates (as some do odd year elections) and set terms the idea is too ingrained into Americans' mindset. Plus most Americans aren't familiar with a non-directly elected head of government, even if it's not too dissimilar from the Speaker of the House.

Some countries with a parliamentary system have fixed terms, e.g. Norway, and they seem to do fine.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.