FL-13/St. Pete Polls: Jolly+2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2024, 11:49:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  2014 House Election Polls
  FL-13/St. Pete Polls: Jolly+2
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FL-13/St. Pete Polls: Jolly+2  (Read 665 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 09, 2014, 07:44:52 PM »

Rep. David Jolly: 48%
Fmr. CFO Alex Sink: 46%
Undecided: 6%

Sample size around 900, MoE ±3%
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2014, 07:46:11 PM »

Makes sense. Nothing much has changed since the election.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2014, 08:04:44 PM »

Hmm. This thread is quite amusing.


PPP should be out with a poll showing Jolly losing soon.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2014, 08:06:22 PM »

Meh, I guess you gotta trust the locals more.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2014, 09:42:17 PM »

Makes sense. Nothing much has changed since the election.

You'd expect the higher turnout of a non special election to favor Sink, though that might be cancelled out by Jolly's incumbency now.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,288
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2014, 08:31:59 AM »

Makes sense. Nothing much has changed since the election.

You'd expect the higher turnout of a non special election to favor Sink, though that might be cancelled out by Jolly's incumbency now.

Or we could...you know...run a good candidate who actually lives in the district Tongue
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2014, 12:42:09 PM »

Makes sense. Nothing much has changed since the election.

You'd expect the higher turnout of a non special election to favor Sink, though that might be cancelled out by Jolly's incumbency now.

Or we could...you know...run a good candidate who actually lives in the district Tongue

Let's save Justice or Ehrlich for 2016. I'm confident either would make stellar representatives.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2014, 12:47:43 PM »

Makes sense. Nothing much has changed since the election.

You'd expect the higher turnout of a non special election to favor Sink, though that might be cancelled out by Jolly's incumbency now.

Or we could...you know...run a good candidate who actually lives in the district Tongue

Let's save Justice or Ehrlich for 2016. I'm confident either would make stellar representatives.

I'd like to strongly encourage the Democratic Party to go along with this advice and not compete in potentially competitive districts in 2014.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2014, 12:33:41 PM »

Makes sense. Nothing much has changed since the election.

You'd expect the higher turnout of a non special election to favor Sink, though that might be cancelled out by Jolly's incumbency now.

Or we could...you know...run a good candidate who actually lives in the district Tongue

Let's save Justice or Ehrlich for 2016. I'm confident either would make stellar representatives.

I'd like to strongly encourage the Democratic Party to go along with this advice and not compete in potentially competitive districts in 2014.

You're implying this won't be between 2002-2010 for us though. I'm pretty sure even the most hackish hacks can admit that we aren't favored.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 14 queries.