Give a detailed, sincere, honest description of the previous poster(II)

[windjammer]

Go!

[I Will Not Be Wrong]

No.

[Potatoe]

A Fiscally Liberal, Social Moderate who happens to be a Foreign Policy hawk, who seems to admire Rep. Colleen Hanabusa, and dislikes Socialism, and seems to like to use Exclamation Marks a lot, and also really likes discussing stuff relating to: opebo, threads about opebo, uh, other things like that about the forum community.

WARNING:May be complete bull, but whatever.

[Хahar 🤔]

Like all young people who are into politics (and like I was at one point), he's an insufferable bore, which is compounded by his total lack of any sense of humor. In addition, he tries far too hard to fit in with all the other teenagers, which means lambasting things he doesn't understand in an attempt to gain respect. It's not really working. He should take it easy and maybe go outside and in a few years he'll be better.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Definitely one of our most brilliant posters. He's two years younger than me, yet I look up on him for his maturity and his amazing historical and political knowledge. He's also a very cool guy who doesn't take himself and others too seriously and has a life outside of the forum. In short, one of the best.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Like it or not Tony, your my socialist twin . Introverted, strongly held political views, and an intense interest in politics. The only real difference is your inability to laugh at some things and a fondness for outrage. Like me, you also think that your political views are widely held, even though we're both on the fringe.

[RogueBeaver]

Libertarian domestically and non-interventionist abroad, strongly held views & very interested in politics. Dislikes Moderate Heroes.

[windjammer]

Well, Chairmansanchez.

Your political views are scaring me. Especially because you have globally the same views than Jean Marie Le Pen, someone I strongly dislike. However, you seem to have improved on some critical points like race issues. If I have understood, you were initially a "racist". And that doesn't seem to be the case, except your willingness to defend Scott about voting suppression. But I'm sure, given the fact that this forum is extremely dem leaning, you will change your views about that. However, the rest of your views, I disagree, but I respect. But on immigration and racism, I hope you will be more open-minded.

However personally, you're really a nice guy, who seems to have some problems because of your brother's friends haha. Seriously, I'm sure irl, we could possibily be friends. You seem to be easy-going .

----------------------
And Roguebeaver.
Hmmmmm
A nice guy, who is probably the most beloved conservative on this forum. I'm glad to have him because he always contributes well to the Congressional Elections board.
He just should be more willing to debate on politic issues. Because I'm sure his views are extremely "built" and it could basically be interesting. The forum lacks of real conservatives willing to debate!

[Cassius]

A polite and courteous, old-school social-democrat, one with a deep belief in the power of the state to better and enrich the lives of its citizens, even if they're a little skittish about it at first. A solid centre-leftist in other words.

[H. Ross Peron]

An honest and unabashed High Tory monarchist. Appears to firmly believe in the Divine Right of Kings and the necessity of both Throne and Sceptre (embodies in the Roman Catholic Church) to keep the masses in line. Not as interested in economic issues or foreign policy issues as most other right-wingers (or left-wingers for that matter). Overall I think you are an honest and decent person on a personal level, but your politics are to the right of Edmund Burke.

[Dr. Cynic]

Just one of those moderate, if idiosyncratic, left-leaners. Seems to genuinely want to vote for moderates in either party at the expense of voting for party. Unlike other so called moderate heroes, I think he's very genuine in his centrism and genuinely would rather see people get things done than go all out and vote for someone who he may actually agree with ideologically.

[Badger]

A guy who is passionate and intelligent. And yet just a bit unsetttled. He isn't entirely happy with his livfe. Most of us aren't of course, but it seems a bit deeper with him in a way I canlt quite put my finger on.

[Antonio the Sixth]

An overall nice and cool dude who went from Democrat to Republican overnight for obscure reasons. He doesn't really seem much interested in political arguments, anyway, and I know almost nothing of his views. Does a pretty good job as a mod.

[windjammer]

Well, Antonio. Hmmmm
Sometimes I like him, sometimes I dislike him. It's like for the other French on this forum, I really can't answer by FF or HP, this is much more complicated.
Why would he be a HP: Simply because he can be utterly annoying with this kind of democrat establishment hack. He's politically a bit like Lief. Except that Lief is great when he does that, mostly because he doesn't put "(normal)" in every single message he wrote about a political issue.
He's too serious. He definitely needs to relax more. This is a forum and he seems to be extremely "psycho-rigid" about fun. And that's why Antonio can sometimes annoy me.

Why would he be a FF: Well, simply because he's a genuinely nice person irl. Probably easy-going, and he contributes well to "Living under Marxism". He seems to have solid views, that represent him well. And he doesn't seem impressed by anyone on this forum. And that's a good point.

So,
as a poster: mixed as a person: FF.