Should felons be allowed to vote?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:02:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should felons be allowed to vote?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Poll
Question: Should felons be allowed to vote?
#1
They should always be allowed to vote again, even in prison
 
#2
They should be allowed to vote again, but after they served their time
 
#3
They should never be allowed to vote again
 
#4
Other opinion?
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 85

Author Topic: Should felons be allowed to vote?  (Read 2808 times)
RedSLC
SLValleyMan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,484
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 24, 2014, 02:52:40 PM »

Oh, and as for me, Option 2, but I also believe that, with a handful of exceptions, only violent criminals should actually be punished with prison time (thus, nonviolent felons would still be able to vote at any time).
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 24, 2014, 03:02:09 PM »

Voting is a right, not a privilege. If we allow prisoners to live, feed them, shelter them, then they should also be able to vote.  Otherwise, what's to stop a politician from throwing all of their opponents in jail so they can't vote? Oh wait, the Republicans are already doing that with Blacks...

It's probably both, and lots of rights are given up when one is in jail.

When voting becomes a privilege, then you are no longer a democracy.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 24, 2014, 03:05:27 PM »

Voting is a right, not a privilege. If we allow prisoners to live, feed them, shelter them, then they should also be able to vote.  Otherwise, what's to stop a politician from throwing all of their opponents in jail so they can't vote? Oh wait, the Republicans are already doing that with Blacks...

It's probably both, and lots of rights are given up when one is in jail.

When voting becomes a privilege, then you are no longer a democracy.

Up until 1920 we weren't a democracy, it seems.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,080
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 24, 2014, 03:10:41 PM »

Voting is a right, not a privilege. If we allow prisoners to live, feed them, shelter them, then they should also be able to vote.  Otherwise, what's to stop a politician from throwing all of their opponents in jail so they can't vote? Oh wait, the Republicans are already doing that with Blacks...

It's probably both, and lots of rights are given up when one is in jail.

When voting becomes a privilege, then you are no longer a democracy.

Up until 1920 we weren't a democracy, it seems.

Indeed.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 24, 2014, 03:21:47 PM »

Voting is a right, not a privilege. If we allow prisoners to live, feed them, shelter them, then they should also be able to vote.  Otherwise, what's to stop a politician from throwing all of their opponents in jail so they can't vote? Oh wait, the Republicans are already doing that with Blacks...

It's probably both, and lots of rights are given up when one is in jail.

When voting becomes a privilege, then you are no longer a democracy.

Up until 1920 we weren't a democracy, it seems.

That's not even a controversial belief.
Logged
Grumpier Than Uncle Joe
GM3PRP
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,080
Greece
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 24, 2014, 03:25:36 PM »

I'm still for no voting while you're in the slammer on a felony rap.  Lots of rights get placed on hold in jail....this one should as well.
Logged
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,596


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: April 24, 2014, 03:33:13 PM »

I'm not really sure how democracy can be defined in one particular way (after all, you *could* say that the UK isn't a democracy because it witholds the vote from prisoners), given that the concept means so many different things, both now and in a historical context. I mean, under the definition of democracy that seems to be being proposed in this thread, the very cracle of democracy, Ancient Athens, would not qualify. As for the United States prior to 1920 (or indeed, 1971, as, I believe, that was the last time when the franchise was reformed), if it wasn't a democracy, then what was it. A monarchy or oligarchy? No. Then what?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: April 24, 2014, 04:05:45 PM »

Maybe after they serve their sentence, but not before then.  After all, they gave us Al Franken.

Stop trolling and stop reposting myths that have long been debunked.  Just because you keep repeating it doesn't mean it's true.

It's probably best to just ignore trolls like Oldies.

Until I took a look at your user name and not just your avatar, I was all set to post this in the Irony Ore Mine.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: April 24, 2014, 04:22:01 PM »
« Edited: April 24, 2014, 04:29:28 PM by oakvale »

After they've served their time, sure. While incarcerated? No, it's a reasonable part of criminal punishment.

I get the feeling you're becoming more American than a lot of Americans here.

Or does Ireland still do this?

I don't think we do. I know the UK does. I'm not sure why it's considered okay to temporarily deprive someone of a whole array of rights after they commit a serious crime but voting is apparently untouchable.

e: It's something I think should ideally be confined to serious/violent criminals, but my main point - that I don't have a problem with restricting the franchise from certain incarcerated criminals as one of the many rights they forfeit, stands.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: April 24, 2014, 04:25:39 PM »

I don't really feel strongly about voting rights while imprisoned (there are arguments on both sides that I find compelling, but at the end of the day, there is a long list of conditions of confinement that need to be dramatically improved, with not being able to vote close to bottom in importance), but they should definitely have full voting rights once they're released.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: April 24, 2014, 04:29:07 PM »

I don't really feel strongly about voting rights while imprisoned (there are arguments on both sides that I find compelling, but at the end of the day, there is a long list of conditions of confinement that need to be dramatically improved, with not being able to vote close to bottom in importance), but they should definitely have full voting rights once they're released.
I don't agree with you often, but your on the money here.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,303
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: April 24, 2014, 04:40:41 PM »

Voting is a right, not a privilege. If we allow prisoners to live, feed them, shelter them, then they should also be able to vote.  Otherwise, what's to stop a politician from throwing all of their opponents in jail so they can't vote? Oh wait, the Republicans are already doing that with Blacks...

It's probably both, and lots of rights are given up when one is in jail.

When voting becomes a privilege, then you are no longer a democracy.

Up until 1920 we weren't a democracy, it seems.
No, we weren't. Glad to see you agree.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: April 24, 2014, 06:04:01 PM »

Option 2.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: April 24, 2014, 11:32:54 PM »

I'm still for no voting while you're in the slammer on a felony rap.  Lots of rights get placed on hold in jail....this one should as well.

The right to vote is much more sacrosanct than the other rights that are put on hold. I'd put it up there with the right to life.
Logged
Marnetmar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 495
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.58, S: -8.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: April 25, 2014, 11:57:20 AM »

Depends on the felony.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,800


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: April 25, 2014, 01:24:08 PM »

I'm still for no voting while you're in the slammer on a felony rap.  Lots of rights get placed on hold in jail....this one should as well.

The right to vote is much more sacrosanct than the other rights that are put on hold. I'd put it up there with the right to life.

That seems pretty extreme. If convicted felons were asked if they would rather have their right to liberty of movement (free of prison) or their right to vote, I have a hard time thinking that many would choose the latter.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: April 25, 2014, 04:00:24 PM »

Maine and Vermont let incarcerated felons vote.  There don't appear to be any problems.  The rest of the country should restore the franchise, too.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,232
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: April 26, 2014, 07:41:12 AM »

I'm leaning heavily towards option 1, but I can see the argument for option 2. I think permanent disenfranchisement (option 3) is indefensible, except perhaps for electoral crimes.

The reason I have for not wanting felons to vote while in jail or on probation is that their situation makes them vulnerable into being pressured into voting the "right" way and not because felons are unworthy of the franchise.

I thought of that as well, but can't that be remedied by having strict regulations in place that ensure the absolute right to a secret ballot?
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,525
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: April 26, 2014, 02:41:54 PM »

Somewhat conflicted between options one and two.  Certainly, they should not be permanently barred from voting.  There are a number of reasons, but the biggest I think is that many things that are felonies shouldn't be felonies.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: April 30, 2014, 12:17:58 PM »

I'm still for no voting while you're in the slammer on a felony rap.  Lots of rights get placed on hold in jail....this one should as well.

The right to vote is much more sacrosanct than the other rights that are put on hold. I'd put it up there with the right to life.

That seems pretty extreme. If convicted felons were asked if they would rather have their right to liberty of movement (free of prison) or their right to vote, I have a hard time thinking that many would choose the latter.

Just because someone wants something more than something else doesn't make that desire more of a right than the other. I'm sure many felons would rather have the right to commit crimes than the right to vote too.

And I just want to point out that in Canada, all prisoners have the right to vote, and we're doing just fine.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: April 30, 2014, 12:44:04 PM »

All persons over the age of 16 should be allowed to vote, whether incarcerated or not. All restrictions placed upon persons who have served their time should be abolished the minute they leave prison, with few exceptions (such as in the case of child abusers, and while I don't support sex offender registries, I do support preventing known child abusers from working with children).

Prisoners should be allowed to vote, as well as to organize unions and collectively bargain over their conditions, with the ultimate end goal of abolishing prisons altogether in favor of restorative justice and/or ostracism if the crime is awful enough.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: May 04, 2014, 05:43:39 PM »


Prisoners should be allowed to vote, as well as to organize unions and collectively bargain over their conditions, with the ultimate end goal of abolishing prisons altogether in favor of restorative justice and/or ostracism if the crime is awful enough.

How would that function?
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: May 04, 2014, 07:16:03 PM »

Either 1 or 2. Don't mind the way we do it (i.e. still keep voting rights if in prison for less than 3 years, any longer and you are disenfranchised until you are released), but I don't feel comfortable with the thought of disenfranchisement for any reason.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: May 07, 2014, 04:50:57 AM »


Prisoners should be allowed to vote, as well as to organize unions and collectively bargain over their conditions, with the ultimate end goal of abolishing prisons altogether in favor of restorative justice and/or ostracism if the crime is awful enough.

How would that function?

I'm also curious as to what either of those alternatives would entail.
Logged
Never
Never Convinced
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,623
Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: 3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: May 07, 2014, 12:42:06 PM »


My thoughts exactly.

I'm leaning towards Option 2. There is no reason whatsoever for people who have been convicted of crimes to have a say in who gets elected, but if a felon is released, that would mean our legal system views them as fit to be free again, and it would only make sense for released felons to be fully assimilated back into society, which would include the right to vote.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 14 queries.