Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Upheld by Supreme Court
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:31:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Upheld by Supreme Court
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Upheld by Supreme Court  (Read 566 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,568
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 30, 2014, 12:04:21 AM »
« edited: April 30, 2014, 12:12:30 AM by Frodo »

Court upholds cross-state air pollution rule

By Laura Barron-Lopez - 04/29/14 08:01 PM EDT

The Supreme Court in a 6-2 decision Tuesday upheld a rule that allows the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate air pollution from power plants that crosses state lines, handing a major victory to President Obama.

The rule, a pillar of Obama’s second-term climate change agenda, requires 28 states in the East, Midwest, and South to cut back on sulfur and nitrogen emissions from coal-fired power plants that “contribute significantly” to air problems in other states.

“Victory for lungs everywhere: SCOTUS recognizes dirty air doesn’t stop at state borders, upholds #EPA pollution rules,” John Podesta, a senior adviser to Obama, wrote on Twitter.

A decision against the administration could have imperiled much of Obama’s environmental agenda. The cross-state pollution rule and other regulations in the works all cite powers under the Clean Air Act.

But by ruling that the EPA maintains authority to regulate nitrogen and sulfur emissions from coal plants, the justices raised the bar for the legal challenges that will likely be filed against the administration’s proposals to regulate carbon emissions from new and existing coal-fired power plants.

“EPA’s cost-effective allocation of emission reductions among upwind States, we hold, is a permissible, workable, and equitable interpretation of the Good Neighbor provision,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in the majority opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read more: http://thehill.com/regulation/energy-environment/204658-supreme-court-upholds-epa-cross-state-air-pollution-rule#ixzz30LKBsHh5
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,338
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2014, 05:33:40 AM »

This is good right?  What are some arguments against it?
Logged
Kushahontas
floating_to_sea
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,627
Kenya


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2014, 08:04:05 AM »

This is good right?  What are some arguments against it?

teh jobs!!1!!
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,338
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2014, 11:08:57 AM »

It seems more jobs would be created, at least temporarily and none (few?) would be lost in the long run.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,146
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2014, 03:42:51 PM »

Glorious news!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.