Which of the following incumbents in Congress will lose reelection?

[GaussLaw]

These 5 strike me as the most endangered incumbents, aside from Michael Grimm.

My predictions:
Rahall, Coffman, and Barber all lose, but Kirkpatrick and Gibson hang on.

[NewYorkExpress]

The three Democrats (Let's face it 2014, is going to be a bloodbath for us... the only question is will it be worse than 2010?)

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Rahill due to it being WVa. 2010 isn't comparable, GOP maxed out its gains. Hoping it is a wash with us still in a  narrow control, losing 3 seats at most in Senate.

[International Brotherhood of Bernard]

The three Democrats (Let's face it 2014, is going to be a bloodbath for us... the only question is will it be worse than 2010?)

Jesus Christ, the negativity is unbearable. Nothing, I repeat, NOTHING indicates that this election will be anywhere near 2010 levels. Will we lose some ground? Probably. Will we lose 6 Senate seats and 63 House seats like in 2010? I highly doubt it. I could see this prediction being made in December or January, but things are starting to look up from the Democrats' perspective.

[Nichlemn]

The three Democrats (Let's face it 2014, is going to be a bloodbath for us... the only question is will it be worse than 2010?)

Jesus Christ, the negativity is unbearable. Nothing, I repeat, NOTHING indicates that this election will be anywhere near 2010 levels. Will we lose some ground? Probably. Will we lose 6 Senate seats and 63 House seats like in 2010? I highly doubt it. I could see this prediction being made in December or January, but things are starting to look up from the Democrats' perspective.

-6 Senate seats is quite plausible, -63 House seats obviously not. It's really a matter of what seats are up - the Senate has more low-hanging fruit now than in 2010, but there is much less in the House.

[IceSpear]

Coffman and Barber. I'm still cautiously optimistic for Rahall, and I don't think Gibson or Kirkpatrick are in too much danger.

[Maxwell]

Doesn't Gibson have a terribad opponent? He'll survive easy.

Coffman, Rahall, and Barber probably go down. Kirkpatrick probably survives.

[badgate]

The thing about Barber is he won the special election, and conventional wisdom would say that Dem turnout should've been down in that just as it is in midterm general elections. So I think it's a coin flip right now.

[windjammer]

Barber, he will probavly be defeated.

Rahall, I'm not sure.
Gibson and Coffman will probably be reelected.

[publicunofficial]

Coffman is toast, Barber or Rahall are complete coinflips, Gibson is as safe as can be in his district, Kirkpatrick more likely than not survives.

[windjammer]

"coin flip"? What does that mean?

[SWE]

"coin flip"? What does that mean?

50/50 chance

[Never]

Nick Rahall and Ron Barber will probably lose. I think Mike Coffman is a pure tossup for reelection. If Cory Gardner wins the Senate race in CO, I would expect Coffman to hold on, but if Udall wins that contest, I think that Coffman would be in grave danger.