Pacific Council: Transgender Protection Act (Tabled)

[Cranberry]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: PJ

Alright, in the post he said he just copied it from the Midwest. I am not particullarly in favour of doing so, so I'll provide an amendment; that there is at least some Pacific in it

[Cranberry]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That would be the amendment.

[Oakvale]

Are we trying economic stimulus in the form of a boom in bathroom construction?

[Cranberry]

Lol. Maybe it was PJ's intent

God, that bill is so unnecessary, I don't know if I'm allowed, but I'd close it right away.

[Oakvale]

It'd be a lot easier to simply make existing bathrooms gender neutral than what's being suggested in the original bill, I think, but you're right that this isn't the most pressing issue. I'd support tabling.

[Cranberry]

Ok. I'll assume I'm allowed to do so, and table that bill for an indefinite amount of time.

[DemPGH]

I also support tabling.

I think the way it's done is, someone makes a motion to table. Cranberry, that can be you. Simfan or Devin would second. If I can follow, I'll second it now.

This might be in the RARCO (Random Acronym Related to Council Order), which I want to dig up and take a look at anyway, if it still even applies since we passed a new constitution. The 4th Const. may have voided it, I'll have to check. If it still applies, I want to amend it.

[Cranberry]

Ok, good. It's a good bill to find all this stuff out, I'll give it that

So then, I make motion to table.