Labor Party Spring 2014 Convention - New Orleans, LA (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:50:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Labor Party Spring 2014 Convention - New Orleans, LA (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Labor Party Spring 2014 Convention - New Orleans, LA  (Read 22950 times)
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« on: May 25, 2014, 06:36:13 AM »

X bore
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2014, 07:18:45 AM »


Welcome to the party!
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2014, 08:20:07 AM »

Fall 2014 Labor Party Convention Location

[  ] Honolulu, HI
[  ] San Francisco, CA
[ X ] Seattle, WA
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2014, 06:12:47 PM »

Another thing that might be worth adding to the platform: a position on group marriages. The Northeast became the first Region to legalize polyamorous marriages and I for one hope they will not be the last. Should the federal Labor Party take a position on such an issue?

I think group marriages are an issue, like conscience issues more generally, at least in britain, where members of the party should be free to disagree with each other.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2014, 04:49:38 PM »

Aye
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2014, 06:39:04 AM »


Chair:

[X] Adam Griffin
[  ] Write-in:

Vice-Chair:

[X] TNF
[  ] Write-in:

General Secretary:

[X] Barnes
[  ] Write-in:

Attorney-At-Law:

[X] Write-in: Bacon King
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2014, 06:22:39 AM »

With regard to game reform, I think I've made it clear throughout my active time that I consider this the most important issue.

The important principle, for me, is we need to remember that atlasia is a game, and must be treated as a game. That means that we can support things we wouldn't in real life if it makes the game easier, like having the SoFE administering federal amendments and vice versa. In real life, I agree that the personality driven approach of the US is a bad idea, it would be far better to have a parliamentary system. In the game though, I would rather have an active intelligent right winger like shua in the senate than an inactive left wing hack. Not so in real life. So I think oakvale has a point, in an elections game we do have to be voting, to some extent on personality.

[moderate hero] With regard to nationalisation I favour the nationalisation of natural monopolies [/moderate hero]
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2014, 07:06:10 AM »



Should the Labor Party platform include an executive summary of the contents inside prior to the body of the document?
Select only one option.
[ X ] Yes
[  ] No

Do you support the Industry section of the platform as is currently written?
Select only one option.
[  ] Yes
[ X ] No

If you answered 'no', what changes would you like to see made?
Select all that apply.
[  ] Removal of the plank calling for nationalization of power and fuel companies.
[ X ] Clarification or modification of the plank calling for nationalization of power and fuel companies. (This essentially means that you support the idea of power and fuel company nationalization, you just want to see the plank re-written in the interests of coming to a consensus within the party as to what that means, exactly)
[  ] Removal of the plank calling for nationalization of transportation.
[ X ] Clarification or modification of the plank calling for nationalization of transportation.
[ X ] Removal of the plank calling for nationalization of iron and steel.
[  ] Clarification of the plank calling for nationalization of iron and steel.
[  ] Removal of the plank calling for federal chartering of corporations.
[  ] Clarification or modification of the plank calling for federal chartering of corporations.
[  ] Removal of the 'Policy for Exports' plank.
[  ] Clarification or modification of the 'Policy for Exports' plank.
[  ] Removal of the 'Production for use' plank.
[  ] Clarification or modification of the 'Production for use' plank.
[  ] Removal of the 'Modernize collective bargaining' plank.
[  ] Clarification or modification of the 'Modernize collective bargaining' plank.
[  ] Removal of the 'Industrial democracy' plank.
[  ] Clarification or modification of the 'Industrial democracy' plank.
[  ] Removal of the 'Promote cooperative industry' plank.
[  ] Clarification or modification of the 'Promote cooperative industry' plank.
[  ] Removal of the 'Streamline the state' plank.
[  ] Clarification or modification of the 'Streamline the state' plank.

Do you support the Agriculture section of the platform as is currently written?
Select one option.
[ X ] Yes
[  ] No

If you answered 'no', what changes would you like to see made?
Type all suggestions below.

Do you support the Housing section of the platform as is currently written?
Select one option.
[ X ] Yes
[  ] No

If you answered 'no', what changes would you like to see made?
Type all suggestions below.

Do you support the Education and Leisure section of the platform as is currently written?
Select one option.
[  ] Yes
[ X ] No

If you answered 'no', what changes would you like to see made?
Type all suggestions below.

From an in game point of view, I don't think it makes sense to centralize all powers to the federal government, as that gives the regional governments nothing to legislate on.

Do you support the Health and Children section of the platform as is currently written?
Select one option.
[ X ] Yes
[  ] No

If you answered 'no', what changes would you like to see made?
Type all suggestions below.

Do you support the Social Insurance section of the platform as is currently written?
Select one option.
[ X ] Yes
[  ] No

If you answered 'no', what changes would you like to see made?
Type all suggestions below.

Do you support the Peace section of the platform as is currently written?
Select one option.
[  ] Yes
[ X ] No

If you answered 'no', what changes would you like to see made?
Type all suggestions below.]

There are some scenarios, such as a genocide, where I think we are obligated to intervene, even if it does not impact us.

Do you support the addition of a section to the platform concerning Game Reform?
Select one option.
[ X ] Yes
[  ] No

If you answered 'yes', what would you like it to call for?
Select all that apply.
[ X ] Bicameral federal legislature.
[  ] Open party-list proportional representation.
[  ] Closed party-list proportional representation.
[  ] Mixed member proportional representation.
[  ] FPTP
[  ] Referendums at the federal level.
[ X ] Single thread, SoFE administered referendums for the approval of all constitutional amendments.
[  ] Selection of a percentage of officeholders by lot rather than election.
[  ] Write-in: We already have referendums at a federal level.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.