SENATE BILL: Rapists Shouldn't Have Custody Act of 2014 (Redraft Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:12:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Rapists Shouldn't Have Custody Act of 2014 (Redraft Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Rapists Shouldn't Have Custody Act of 2014 (Redraft Law'd)  (Read 2647 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« on: June 07, 2014, 10:26:39 AM »
Alfred's amendment is friendly.

This is apparently a real life problem, which is what caused me to introduce the bill. It's pretty straightforward. Rapists shouldn't get to have custody of children they fathered through rape.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2014, 12:02:25 PM »
I am prepared for a final vote.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2014, 10:46:01 AM »
Amendment is friendly.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2014, 11:29:52 AM »
I'm ready for a final vote.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2014, 08:07:56 AM »
Aye
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2014, 10:21:03 AM »
lol @ people being 'concerned' about how constitutional this is or isn't, but apparently not being concerned by the fact that a rapist today has the possibility of gaining custody over a child fathered through unconsensual intercourse
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2014, 03:33:08 PM »
Quote from: Speaker Deus on June 16, 2014, 03:23:15 PM
Quote from: Senator TNF on June 16, 2014, 10:21:03 AM
lol @ people being 'concerned' about how constitutional this is or isn't, but apparently not being concerned by the fact that a rapist today has the possibility of gaining custody over a child fathered through unconsensual intercourse
What's the point of even having a Constitution if it can be blatantly violated like this?

The Constitution is a creature of interpretation. Just because shua argues that this is unconstitutional does not necessarily make it so. The fact that the federal government takes precedence over the Regional governments is pretty clear. If someone wants to defend the right of rapists to have custody over children they father through rape in the courts, let them do so. But I see no issue with constitutionality in this piece of legislation.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2014, 03:40:49 PM »
Unless you think that rapists have a "right" to custody of the children they have fathered through rape, I fail to see how that is a violation of the Constitution. (I obviously do not believe such a "right" inherently exists for rapists)
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2014, 11:14:21 AM »
I motion for a vote on the redraft.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2014, 10:29:07 AM »
Aye
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2014, 10:46:32 AM »
I for one await the challenge by those pro-rapist elements to this humane and progressive law.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.