why do poors typically have a lot of kids?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:34:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  why do poors typically have a lot of kids?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: why do poors typically have a lot of kids?  (Read 2507 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,243
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 10, 2014, 07:07:04 PM »

Just wondering, but why do you call poor people "poors"? Surely you realise how crass and dehumanising that sounds?

https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Opebo_speak

In that case, apologies to Walter! Cheesy
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 13, 2014, 11:36:50 AM »

I'm not aware of them having significantly more kids than anyone else

It's pretty well documented.  

For example, in 2010 the annual fertility rate for those with annual household incomes under $10K is about 99 (per 1000 women).  For households with about $30K annual income the fertility rate is about 67.  For households with about $60K the fertility rate is about 54.

It also tracks somewhat with GDP by country.  There are a few exceptions of course.  Here's a plot of a different sort of fertility rate (total children per adult woman) versus GDP:



If you put that on a semilog plot with raw data on the vertical axis and ln(GDP) on the horizontal axis, it is easier to see the downward slope.  

There are a number of scholarly articles out there attempting to explain this phenomenon.  A google search will turn up too many.  I prefer my own rather low-brow analysis.

Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 13, 2014, 03:08:11 PM »

Yeah, it's also the case that higher education levels, particularly among women, mean less children. In the end, I think that affluence and education mean that people have more options and choices in life, and I'm sure that that affects their goals and what they do in life. You know, they're more likely to leave the vicinity in which they grew up, wait to have children, not have them, travel the world, etc. You can find anecdotal and documented evidence pretty easily. 
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 13, 2014, 05:50:03 PM »

I'm not aware of them having significantly more kids than anyone else

It's pretty well documented.  

For example, in 2010 the annual fertility rate for those with annual household incomes under $10K is about 99 (per 1000 women).  For households with about $30K annual income the fertility rate is about 67.  For households with about $60K the fertility rate is about 54.

It also tracks somewhat with GDP by country.  There are a few exceptions of course.  Here's a plot of a different sort of fertility rate (total children per adult woman) versus GDP:



If you put that on a semilog plot with raw data on the vertical axis and ln(GDP) on the horizontal axis, it is easier to see the downward slope.  

There are a number of scholarly articles out there attempting to explain this phenomenon.  A google search will turn up too many.  I prefer my own rather low-brow analysis.



I'm talking about poor Americans. I'm not aware of any statistic showing poor Americans have significantly more children than Americans as a whole in the modern era.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.